FACULTYTALK Archives

December 2005

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Levin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
Date:
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:44:12 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (212 lines)
Good job Elaine.

I'm ready for some articles of impeachment to be issued against our 
current President.  His misconduct is about 100, 000 times worse than 
*anything* President Clinton was alleged to have done.

Dan Levin
Minnesota State

>OK: here's a response:
>Which penumbras do you prefer?
>(a) Those that create and protect individual rights and freedoms
>(b) Those that trample on the above.
>(c) Both
>(d) Neither
>
>Sorry--I couldn't resist.Elaine
>
>
>	-----Original Message-----
>	From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk on 
>behalf of Keith Maxwell
>	Sent: Mon 12/19/2005 4:33 PM
>	To: [log in to unmask]
>	Cc:
>	Subject: Penumbras again
>
>
>
>	ALSBers:
>
>
>
>	I'm taking an informal survey related to a recent current event.
>
>
>
>	Which penumbra do you prefer?
>
>	(a)     The one Douglas found in the First Amendment
>
>	(b)     The one the President finds in Article II
>
>	(c)     Both
>
>	(d)     Neither
>
>
>
>	ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
>	Keith A. Maxwell
>	Nat S. and Marian W. Rogers Professor  
>	Professor of Legal Studies and Ethics
>	School of Business and Leadership
>	University of Puget Sound
>	Tacoma, WA 98416
>	Office Phone: 253.879.3703
>	www.ups.edu/faculty/maxwell/home.htm
>	ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
>
>
>
>
>   _____ 
>
>
>	From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk 
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kenneth Schneyer
>	Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:18 AM
>	To: [log in to unmask]
>	Subject: Re: Penumbra metaphors
>
>
>
>	Isn't the literal meaning of penumbra sufficiently 
>metaphorical for legal purposes?  "A partial shadow, as in an 
>eclipse, between regions of complete shadow and complete 
>illumination."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>	Ken Schneyer
>
>
>
>	-----Original Message-----
>	From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk 
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Keith Maxwell
>	Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 6:34 PM
>	To: [log in to unmask]
>	Subject: Penumbra metaphors
>
>
>
>	A metaphor for "penumbra"? What about the aftertaste that 
>lingers on the palate after a sip of an excellent wine. Though 
>originalists will likely disagree, the "penumbra du vin," like its 
>constitutional counterpart, is not whimsical at all-it is a quality 
>of the wine. If you do not like the aftertaste, drink different 
>wine. (Lest I be misunderstood, the latter is NOT a metaphor for 
>"love it or leave it", but it could be one for Article V.)
>
>
>
>	Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>	ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
>	Keith A. Maxwell
>	Nat S. and Marian W. Rogers Professor  
>	Professor of Legal Studies and Ethics
>	School of Business and Leadership
>	University of Puget Sound
>	Tacoma, WA 98416
>	Office Phone: 253.879.3703
>	www.ups.edu/faculty/maxwell/home.htm
>	ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
>
>
>
>
>   _____ 
>
>
>	From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk 
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Frank Cross
>	Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 7:47 AM
>	To: [log in to unmask]
>	Subject: Re: my point, and cakes as the Constitution
>
>
>
>
>	This is not a good metaphor for originalists. 
>	If I'm eating a cake, I definitely want input from the 
>international community.  Certainly the French and Viennese.  And I 
>don't want the same old exact cake, over and over again, prepared 
>from a recipe that permits no departures.
>
>
>
>	At 09:39 AM 12/12/2005, David W. Opderbeck wrote:
>
>	To your nose, what scent connotes sweet justice?
>
>	I'm not sure, but I'll bet I could find something in the law 
>and norms of the international community that would provide some 
>guidance.
>
>	David W. Opderbeck
>	Assistant Professor of Business Law
>	Baruch College, City University of New York
>	(646) 312-3602
>	[log in to unmask]
>
>
>	"Michael O'Hara" <[log in to unmask]>
>	Sent by: "Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk" 
><[log in to unmask]>
>	12/12/2005 09:08 AM CST
>	Please respond to "Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk"
>
>	To: [log in to unmask]
>	cc:
>	bcc:
>	Subject: Re: my point, and cakes as the Constitution
>
>
>	David:
>
>	I love your sense of humor, it so exhibits the overtones of an
>	emanation.  Clearly, the cake's penumbra would be the those 
>tastes a cook
>	calls a shadow of a flavor (e.g., hickory flavor is strong 
>and meringue if
>	weak).  The emanations, of course, would the aromas of the 
>cake.  To your
>	nose, what scent connotes sweet justice?
>
>	Michael
>
>	Professor Michael J. O'Hara, J.D., Ph.D.
>	Finance, Banking, & Law Department        Editor, Journal of Legal
>	Economics
>	College of Business Administration        (402) 554 - 2014 
>voice fax (402)
>	554 - 3825
>	Roskens Hall 502                    www.AAEFE.org 
><http://www.aaefe.org/>
>	University of Nebraska at Omaha 
>www.JournalOfLegalEconomics.com 
><http://www.journaloflegaleconomics.com/>
>	Omaha  NE  68182
>	[log in to unmask]
>	(402) 554 - 2823 voice  fax (402) 554 - 2680
>	http://cba.unomaha.edu/faculty/mohara/web/ohara.htm
>
>	**********************************************************
>
>	Frank Cross
>	McCombs School of Business
>	The University of Texas at Austin
>	1 University Station B6000
>	Austin, TX 78712-1178

ATOM RSS1 RSS2