CLEANACCESS Archives

June 2006

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: CAS In-Band Management
From:
Ryan Dorman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:16:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
We are in a Real-IP configuration. (2 CAS, 1 CAM)

Yes, there is a performance hit for having the CAS be the router and yes you
don't get as much visibility into the CAS as a router as you would with
dedicated network hardware but it serves the purpose best for our network
topology.
-- 
Ryan Dorman, CCNP
Network Engineering Specialist
Millersville University
717.871.5883



On 6/14/06 2:06 PM, "Jonathan Wayman" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> What seems to be the most common deployment for in-band? Virtual gateway (L2
> bridinging only), Real-IP gateway (CAS is the gateway for the untrusted
> subnet(s)), or NAT?  I realize that this depends quite a bit on network
> topology and what you want to accomplish.  I would just like to get a feel
> for how most people have this deployed.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2