Well put Brad.

I couldn't agree more.  If I want to watch people endlessly debate the 
pros/cons of something, I'll go read rec.politics or some such newsgroup. 

Eric



Brad Kramer <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
<[log in to unmask]>
10/20/2006 01:19 PM
Please respond to
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
<[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: Around clean access






Alright- I think we have digressed one discussion into another
As Joe stated, there are vulnerabilities, as Bruce stated, we know and for
lack of a better way of stating it, we don't necessarily care, and if we 
do,
we can take drastic measures to make sure it doesn't happen.

Once and for all, this is not a discussion about how we feel about clean
access. We can safely make the assumption that we cant convince you (Joe)
that clean access is for the better of the residential networks. 
Personally
that is of no loss to me. We can probably also assume that each CCA Admin
that is in the listserv expected a few students that flat out -would not
like- clean access.

PLEASE keep the I hate/love CCA battles off of the public discussion.
I respect the fact that you don't appreciate the importance of a NAC
appliance, but again, I don't care. If you want to have discussion about 
NEW
technical issues, please present them to this group. Otherwise We know how
everyone feels about this issue.

-------------
Bradley W. Kramer
Network Analyst
Ashland University
(419) 289-5405
[log in to unmask]