Sorry, Rahesh. Here it is. Obviously, this one wasn't taken anywhere near
a peak time.
top - 07:25:28 up 35 days, 20:33, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Tasks: 71 total, 2 running, 69 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 4.3% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 95.7% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Mem: 2076300k total, 1794124k used, 282176k free, 40560k buffers
Swap: 2040244k total, 0k used, 2040244k free, 1552316k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
3061 root 25 0 1109m 117m 13m S 4.3 5.8 193:31.24 java
1 root 16 0 1680 552 472 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.96 init
2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0
3 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.02 events/0
4 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.30 khelper
9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
18 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
83 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.08 kblockd/0
91 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd
141 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush
142 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.27 pdflush
144 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0
143 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 kswapd0
749 root 25 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod
910 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0
914 root 21 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0
923 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:42.65 kjournald
top - 07:25:31 up 35 days, 20:33, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Tasks: 71 total, 1 running, 70 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.3% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.7% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Mem: 2076300k total, 1794148k used, 282152k free, 40560k buffers
Swap: 2040244k total, 0k used, 2040244k free, 1552316k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
3061 root 25 0 1109m 117m 13m S 0.3 5.8 193:31.25 java
22855 root 16 0 7208 2300 1864 S 0.3 0.1 0:00.02 sshd
1 root 16 0 1680 552 472 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.96 init
2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0
3 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.02 events/0
4 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.30 khelper
9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
18 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
83 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.08 kblockd/0
91 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd
141 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush
142 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.27 pdflush
144 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0
143 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 kswapd0
749 root 25 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod
910 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0
914 root 21 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0
top - 07:25:34 up 35 days, 20:33, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Tasks: 71 total, 2 running, 69 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.7% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Mem: 2076300k total, 1794148k used, 282152k free, 40560k buffers
Swap: 2040244k total, 0k used, 2040244k free, 1552316k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1 root 16 0 1680 552 472 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.96 init
2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0
3 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.02 events/0
4 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.30 khelper
9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
18 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
83 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.08 kblockd/0
91 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd
141 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush
142 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.27 pdflush
144 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0
143 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 kswapd0
749 root 25 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod
910 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0
914 root 21 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0
923 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:42.65 kjournald
1864 root 14 -4 1572 500 428 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.05 udevd
top - 07:25:37 up 35 days, 20:33, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Tasks: 71 total, 2 running, 69 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Mem: 2076300k total, 1794148k used, 282152k free, 40560k buffers
Swap: 2040244k total, 0k used, 2040244k free, 1552316k cached
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:53:12 -0700, Rajesh Nair (rajnair) <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>Michael,
>
>Need it for the CAM also.
>
>-Rajesh.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Case
>Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 7:23 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Slow Login Times
>
>Sorry for the length of this:
>
>=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= PuTTY log 2006.10.04 10:1
>9:59 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
>top - 10:19:39 up 34 days, 23:13, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.06,
>0.0
>7
>Tasks: 74 total, 2 running, 72 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
>Cpu(s): 4.6% us, 3.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 88.1% id, 0.0% wa, 2.0% hi,
>2.3% si
>Mem: 2076300k total, 642404k used, 1433896k free, 51792k buffers
>Swap: 2040244k total, 0k used, 2040244k free, 359224k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>
>
>
>
> 2925 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 1.3 0.0 465:13.52 kclick
>
>
>
>
> 3083 root 20 0 1161m 116m 14m S 1.0 5.8 442:31.22 java
>
>
>
>
> 2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 1:04.70 ksoftirqd/0
>
>
>
>
>
> 3 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 1:57.81 events/0
>
>
>
>
> 1 root 15 0 1680 552 472 S 0.0 0.0 0:15.54 init
>
>
>
>
> 4 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:08.48 khelper
>
>
>
>
> 9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
>
>
>
>
> 18 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
>
>
>
>
> 83 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.12 kblockd/0
>
>
>
>
> 141 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush
>
>
>
>
> 142 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.18 pdflush
>
>
>
>
> 144 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0
>
>
>
>
> 143 root 24 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kswapd0
>
>
>
>
> 91 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd
>
>
>
>
> 749 root 24 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod
>
>
>
>
> 912 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0
>
>
>
>
> 916 root 21 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0
>
>
>
>
> 925 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:31.13 kjournald
>
>
>
>
> 1893 root 12 -4 1572 500 428 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.03 udevd
>
>
>
>
> 1952 root 23 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00
>shpchpd_even
>t
>
>
>
> 2154 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald
>
>
>
>
> 2433 root 16 0 1552 632 540 S 0.0 0.0 0:24.34 syslogd
>
>
>
>
> 2435 root 16 0 1504 500 436 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 klogd
>
>
>
>
> 2447 root 13 -3 9788 596 496 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 auditd
>
>
>
>
> 2472 root 16 0 4348 1024 852 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.93 rpc.idmapd
>
>
>
>
> 2627 root 16 0 1728 720 604 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.15 automount
>
>
>
>
> 2637 root 16 0 1720 708 596 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.12 automount
>
>
>
>
> 2653 root 16 0 4348 1732 1424 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 sshd
>
>
>
>
> 2660 root 16 0 1712 528 464 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 gpm
>
>
>
>
> 2671 root 19 0 4952 1392 1056 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 nessusd
>
>
>
>
> 2678 root 16 0 4684 1096 704 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.10 crond
>
>
>
>
> 2691 root 16 0 1728 724 608 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 atd
>
>
>
>
> 2861 root 24 0 2240 1092 936 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 _plutorun
>
>
>
>
> 2862 root 24 0 2240 1100 944 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 _plutorun
>
>
>
>
> 2863 root 16 0 2412 948 828 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.90 pluto
>
>
>
>
> 2864 root 17 0 2236 1076 940 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 _plutoload
>
>
>
>
> 2865 root 24 0 1484 356 308 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 logger
>
>
>
>
> 2917 root 30 10 2412 776 664 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pluto
>
>
>
>
> 2999 root 16 0 1420 208 156 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 _pluto_adns
>
>
>
>
>
> 3137 root 16 0 8788 4692 2832 S 0.0 0.2 0:05.62
>httpd.worker
>
>
>
>
> 3259 root -2 0 4596 4596 1756 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.37 heartbeat
>
>
>
>
> 3263 root 18 0 1488 396 344 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 mingetty
>
>
>
>
> 3264 root 18 0 1488 396 344 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 mingetty
>
> top -
>10:19:42 up 34 days, 23:13, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.06, 0.07
>Tasks: 74 total, 1 running, 73 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
>Cpu(s): 0.7% us, 2.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 91.0% id, 1.3% wa, 2.3% hi,
>2.7% si
>Mem: 2076300k total, 642404k used, 1433896k free, 51792k buffers
>Swap: 2040244k total, 0k used, 2040244k free, 359224k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>
>
>
>
> 2925 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 2.3 0.0 465:13.59 kclick
>
>
>
>
> 3083 root 20 0 1161m 116m 14m S 0.7 5.8 442:31.24 java
>
>
>
>
> 1 root 15 0 1680 552 472 S 0.0 0.0 0:15.54 init
>
>
>
>
> 2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 1:04.70 ksoftirqd/0
>
>
>
>
>
> 3 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 1:57.81 events/0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>top - 10:19:45 up 34 days, 23:13, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.06,
>0.0
>7
>Tasks: 74 total, 2 running, 72 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
>Cpu(s): 0.7% us, 1.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 92.7% id, 0.0% wa, 3.0% hi,
>2.3% si
>Mem: 2076300k total, 642380k used, 1433920k free, 51792k buffers
>Swap: 2040244k total, 0k used, 2040244k free, 359224k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>
>
>
>
> 2925 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 1.7 0.0 465:13.64 kclick
>
>
>
>
> 3083 root 20 0 1161m 116m 14m S 1.0 5.8 442:31.27 java
>
>
>
>
>15021 root 16 0 1956 932 744 R 0.3 0.0 0:00.13 top
>
>
>
>
> 1 root 16 0 1680 552 472 S 0.0 0.0 0:15.54 init
>
>
>
>
> 2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 1:04.70 ksoftirqd/0
>
>
>
>
>
> 3 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 1:57.81 events/0
>
>
>
>
> 4 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:08.48 khelper
>
>
>
>
> 9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
>
>
>
>
> 18 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
>
>
>
>
> 83 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.12 kblockd/0
>
>
>
>
> 141 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush
>
>
>
>
> 142 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.18 pdflush
>
>
>
>
> 144 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0
>
>
>
>
> 143 root 24 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kswapd0
>
>
>
>
> 91 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd
>
>
>
>
> 749 root 24 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod
>
>
>
>
> 912 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0
>
>
>
>
> 916 root 21 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0
>
>
>
>
> 925 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:31.13 kjournald
>
>
>
>
> 1893 root 12 -4 1572 500 428 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.03 udevd
>
>
>
>
> 1952 root 23 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00
>shpchpd_even
>t
>
>
>
> 2154 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald
>
>
>
>
> 2433 root 16 0 1552 632 540 S 0.0 0.0 0:24.34 syslogd
>
>
>
>
> 2435 root 16 0 1504 500 436 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 klogd
>
>
>
>
> 2447 root 13 -3 9788 596 496 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 auditd
>
>
>
>
> 2472 root 16 0 4348 1024 852 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.93 rpc.idmapd
>
>
>
>
> 2627 root 16 0 1728 720 604 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.15 automount
>
>
>
>
> 2637 root 16 0 1720 708 596 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.12 automount
>
>
>
>
> 2653 root 16 0 4348 1732 1424 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 sshd
>
>
>
>
> 2660 root 16 0 1712 528 464 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 gpm
>
>
>
>
> 2671 root 19 0 4952 1392 1056 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 nessusd
>
>
>
>
> 2678 root 16 0 4684 1096 704 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.10 crond
>
>
>
>
> 2691 root 16 0 1728 724 608 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 atd
>
>
>
>
> 2861 root 24 0 2240 1092 936 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 _plutorun
>
>
>
>
> 2862 root 24 0 2240 1100 944 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 _plutorun
>
>
>
>
> 2863 root 16 0 2412 948 828 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.90 pluto
>
>
>
>
> 2864 root 17 0 2236 1076 940 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 _plutoload
>
>
>
>
> 2865 root 24 0 1484 356 308 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 logger
>
>
>
>
> 2917 root 30 10 2412 776 664 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pluto
>
>
>
>
> 2999 root 16 0 1420 208 156 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 _pluto_adns
>
>
>
>
>
> 3137 root 16 0 8788 4692 2832 S 0.0 0.2 0:05.62
>httpd.worker
>
>
>
>
> 3259 root -2 0 4596 4596 1756 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.37 heartbeat
>
>
>
>
> 3263 root 18 0 1488 396 344 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 mingetty
>
> top -
>10:19:48 up 34 days, 23:13, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.06, 0.07
>Tasks: 74 total, 2 running, 72 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
>Cpu(s): 1.0% us, 1.7% sy, 0.0% ni, 93.0% id, 0.3% wa, 2.0% hi,
>2.0% si
>Mem: 2076300k total, 642380k used, 1433920k free, 51792k buffers
>Swap: 2040244k total, 0k used, 2040244k free, 359224k cached
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>
>
>
>
> 2925 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 1.7 0.0 465:13.69 kclick
>
>
>
>
> 3083 root 20 0 1161m 116m 14m S 0.3 5.8 442:31.28 java
>
>
>
>
> 1 root 16 0 1680 552 472 S 0.0 0.0 0:15.54 init
>
>
>
>
> 2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 1:04.70 ksoftirqd/0
>
>
>
>
>
> 3 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 1:57.81 events/0
>
>
>
>
> 4 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:08.48 khelper
>
>
>
>
> 9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
>
>
>
>
> 18 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
>
>
>
>
> 83 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.12 kblockd/0
>
>
>
>
> 141 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush
>
>
>
>
> 142 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.18 pdflush
>
>
>
>
> 144 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0
>
>
>
>
> 143 root 24 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kswapd0
>
>
>
>
> 91 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd
>
>
>
>
> 749 root 24 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod
>
>
>
>
> 912 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0
>
>
>
>
> 916 root 21 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_0
>
>
>
>
> 925 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:31.13 kjournald
>
>
>
>
> 1893 root 12 -4 1572 500 428 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.03 udevd
>
>
>
>
> 1952 root 23 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00
>shpchpd_even
>t
>
>
>
> 2154 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald
>
>
>
>
> 2433 root 15 0 1552 632 540 S 0.0 0.0 0:24.34 syslogd
>
>
>
>
> 2435 root 16 0 1504 500 436 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 klogd
>
>
>
>
> 2447 root 13 -3 9788 596 496 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 auditd
>
>
>
>
> 2472 root 16 0 4348 1024 852 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.93 rpc.idmapd
>
>
>
>
> 2627 root 16 0 1728 720 604 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.15 automount
>
>
>
>
> 2637 root 16 0 1720 708 596 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.12 automount
>
>
>
>
> 2653 root 16 0 4348 1732 1424 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 sshd
>
>
>
>
> 2660 root 16 0 1712 528 464 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 gpm
>
>
>
>
> 2671 root 19 0 4952 1392 1056 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 nessusd
>
>
>
>
> 2678 root 16 0 4684 1096 704 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.10 crond
>
>
>
>
> 2691 root 16 0 1728 724 608 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 atd
>
>
>
>
> 2861 root 24 0 2240 1092 936 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 _plutorun
>
>
>
>
> 2862 root 24 0 2240 1100 944 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 _plutorun
>
>
>
>
> 2863 root 16 0 2412 948 828 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.90 pluto
>
>
>
>
> 2864 root 17 0 2236 1076 940 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 _plutoload
>
>
>
>
> 2865 root 24 0 1484 356 308 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 logger
>
>
>
>
> 2917 root 30 10 2412 776 664 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pluto
>
>
>
>
> 2999 root 16 0 1420 208 156 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 _pluto_adns
>
>
>
>
>
> 3137 root 16 0 8788 4692 2832 S 0.0 0.2 0:05.62
>httpd.worker
>
>
>
>
> 3259 root -2 0 4596 4596 1756 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.37 heartbeat
>
>
>
>
> 3263 root 18 0 1488 396 344 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 mingetty
>
>
>
>
> 3264 root 18 0 1488 396 344 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 mingetty
>
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:25:27 -0700, Rajesh Nair (rajnair)
><[log in to unmask]
>OM>
>wrote:
>
>>Michael,
>>
>>Regarding the scans, no, it does not mean that you should not run the
>>scans. Rather, it is that you should take a look at what the scan does
>
>>and test it before enabling it. Certain scans take a long time to
>>execute...
>>
>>Regarding "top", it is a Unix/Linux command that you can run at the
>>command line which shows the amount of resources being taken up by
>>processes (it is by default sorted by processor). I would like to see
>>if any one process is taking up an inordinate amount of processor.
>>
>>And even if you select many individual AV packages, your login times
>>should be 30 seconds at most, not 2 minutes... So, something is wrong.
>>We just need to figure out what.
>>
>>-Rajesh.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List
>>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Case
>>Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 7:43 PM
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: Slow Login Times
>>
>>Yes, sir, we can replicate this within our control test environment.
>>Eve n on very high end equipment.
>>
>>I don't think we run any Nessus scans but I had hoped to do so. Sounds
>
>>l ike I shouldn't. I do believe we select each anti-virus package
>>instead of A NY.
>> I think our engineer didn't like certain anti-virus packages, like
>>Norto n AV 2002.
>>
>>Thanks for your help,
>>Michael
>>
>>On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:49:13 -0400, Michael Grinnell
>><[log in to unmask]
>>U>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>That would make sense. It would be checking for a much smaller list
>>>of
>
>>
>>>requirements. Each additional requirement checked adds to the login
>
>>>time. Nessus scans can add a significant amount of time to the login
>
>>>if they are failing and timing out.
>>>
>>>Can you replicate this on a test PC?
>>>
>>>Michael Grinnell
>>>Network Security Administrator
>>>The American University
>>>
>>>On Oct 3, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Brian Beausoleil wrote:
>>>
>>>> In my experience I noticed that if you are using the AV Installation
>
>>>> and AV Virus Definition rules (Device Management > Clean Access >
>>>> Rules > New AV
>>>> Rule) and select each supported version rather than ANY, it will
>>>> take
>
>>
>>>> longer to scan the students computer. Now maybe it is just a
>>>> coincidence but to me it seems faster. Is anyone else seeing this
>
>>>> result?
>>>>
>>>> Brian Beausoleil
>>>> Network Services
>>>> Southern CT State University
>>>> Office: (203) 392-6109
>>>> Email: [log in to unmask]
>>>>
>>>> _____
>>>>
>>>> From: Perfigo SecureSmart and CleanMachines Discussion List
>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Truelove
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 8:15 AM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: Slow Login Times
>>>>
>>>> Wow, 2 minutes is a long time.
>>>>
>>>> Are you using any of the Nessus scans ? That could slow down the
>>>> login process.
>>>>
>>>> If everything is up-to-date our users login under 20 seconds.
>>>>
>>>> John Truelove
>>>> OIT Network Engineer - CCNP
>>>> Indiana State University
>>>> 210 N 7th Street, Rankin Rm 54
>>>> Terre Haute, IN 47809
>>>> 812-237-4921
>>>>
>>>> ********************************************************************
>>>> *
>
>>>> *
>>
>>>> ******
>>>> ********************************************************************
>>>> *
>
>>>> *
>>
>>>> *****
>>>> This email, and any attachments, thereto, is intended only for use
>>>> by
>
>>
>>>> the
>>>> addressee(s) named herein and may contain privileged and/or
>>>> confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of
>
>>>> this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>>>> distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto,
>
>>>> is
>>
>>>> strictly prohibited.
>>>> ********************************************************************
>>>> *
>
>>>> *
>>
>>>> ******
>>>> ********************************************************************
>>>> *
>
>>>> *
>>
>>>> *****
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Michael Case <[log in to unmask]> 10/3/2006 8:06 AM >>>
>>>> Good morning --
>>>>
>>>> I've been meeting with each residence hall and one conclusion seems
>
>>>> obvio= us.
>>>> The students don't like how long it takes to log into the CAA
>client.
>
>>>>
>>>> We have the original Dell configuration from when we purchased
>>>> Perfigo
>>
>>>> during the Fall '04 semester. But the servers are not being taxed
>>>> at
>
>>
>>>> all= .
>>>>
>>>> When a student logs in, he/she will have to wait a couple minutes
>>>> before getting access. That's problematic because the college has
>
>>>> asked student= s to turn off PCs at night for energy conservation.
>
>>>> When they get up and w= ant to scan their email before class, they
>
>>>> don't want to wait 2+ minutes and = I don't blame them.
>>>>
>>>> Where should I start looking? I searched this list serve for "slow
>
>>>> login= "
>>>> and different variants but found nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Michael Case
>>>> ITS DirectorManchester College
>>>========================
>
>>========================
>=
>>========================
>
>>========================
>=========================
>=======================
>========================================================================
|
