CLEANACCESS Archives

October 2008

CLEANACCESS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Isabelle Graham <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:18:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Sorry, I was away from email for the evening. We are effectively using the later rule (we 
actually set it up for any supported AV).

--
Isabelle Graham
Information Security
American University

Nathaniel Austin wrote:
> Either or.
> 
> Hennessey, Sean wrote:
>> Ok, here's a further question. If I set up a rule and select the checks
>> for both Symantec Corporate 10 and Symantec Endpoint Protection  11,
>> does it search for both or either or?
>>
>> - Sean
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Sean Hennessey
>>
>> Networking and Information Security Systems Administrator
>>
>> The University of Portland
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Austin
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:10 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Symantec End Point Protection v11
>>
>> Oh sorry - they were using the specific check for the Symantec 
>> Endpoint 11.x:
>>
>> Listed in the report as:
>> av_defn_SymantecEndpointProtection_11_x
>>
>> However it should work with the av_def_Norton_ANY as well (so 
>> selecting ANY under Norton when creating the rule).
>>
>> Nate   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2