ATEG Archives

January 2009

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"STAHLKE, HERBERT F" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:56:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (54 lines)
Dick,

I'm saying that the verb has a zero subject.  Many speakers find such sentences acceptable in speech, as in "There's the guy met me at the airport."  Whether one accepts such a spoken sentence or not, it does have a zero subject.  So in that-relatives, the co-indexed noun in the RC deletes.  In those cases where deletion is prevented by other factors, as with possessives or fronted PPs that-relatives aren't allowed and wh-rels get used.  For many speakers those positions that don't allow deletion show up with resumptive pronouns, as in "The guy that I talked to his brother yesterday lives in Indianapolis."

Herb

Herbert F. W. Stahlke, Ph.D.
Emeritus Professor of English
Ball State University
Muncie, IN  47306
[log in to unmask]
________________________________________
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Veit, Richard [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: January 18, 2009 10:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Pedants that or who?

Herb,

I know you have made this case, but I'd like to hear more. In "the dog who barked," who is a pronoun and the subject of the relative clause. Are you saying that, in "the dog that barked," the verb barked has no subject? Or are you saying that a conjunction can be the subject? Or something else entirely?



Dick


________________________________________
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of STAHLKE, HERBERT F [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 4:11 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Pedants that or who?

We've discussed that vs. who at great length on this list, and I've made the argument, based on grammarians like Jespersen and Huddleston&Pullum, that the claim of a distinction of humanness is false.  Relative-that is not a pronoun; it's a subordinating conjunction, the same as it is with noun clauses.  Because it isn't a pronoun, it can't agree grammatically.  Conjunctions in English don't.  "Who," on the other hand, is a pronoun with human reference.  The "that" form goes back to Old English.  The "wh-" forms in their modern form arise in Middle English after the 13th c.

Herb

Herbert F. W. Stahlke, Ph.D.
Emeritus Professor of English
Ball State University
Muncie, IN  47306
[log in to unmask]

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2