Rand,
If you want to know about my experiences, you may contact me off-list. I
will only say that I verified that Bradford currently supports IE 8.
Bruce Osborne
Liberty University
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:49:37 -0400, Hall, Rand <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Anyone notice the recent dearth of Cisco input on this list? I find that
troubling.
>
>Direct quotes on the list last fall from a Cisco support person (name
omitted because he's innocent):
>
>"Word from the BU is that they will only update from Microsoft once a
>month, so this one will not go into the checks and rule set until next
>months Patch Tuesday release."
>
>"All I can say is that myself and some of my colleagues did put some
>pressure on to add this in. I know we sound like a broken record when we
>say this, but I would strongly encourage anyone who is unhappy about
>this to tell their account teams and have them put pressure on from
>their side as well."
>
>So, this will be at least the third time in six months that Cisco's
shrugging ambivalence has made their product ineffective.
>
>In October, Microsoft issued a critical out-of-band patch for which Cisco
would not create checks.
>
>In November, Cisco botched an update which ultimately prevented access to
the aforementioned and now long-awaited out-of-band patch check.
>
>And now, IE8.
>
>The first two times I followed the prescribed advice and ran my concern
up through my account team...and heard nothing.
>
>Unfortunately, I think I'm going to be forced to return the favor. I'm
one of the original Perfigo people who's got the end of life software.
When the Cisco NAC RFQ line doesn't this summer ring they'll know it was
me.
>
>So, Bruce, how do you like Bradford?
>
>Cheers,
>Rand
>
>--
>Rand P. Hall * Director, Network Services
>Merrimack College * SunGard Higher Education
>315 Turnpike Street, North Andover MA 01845 * Tel 978-837-5000
>Fax 978-837-5383 * [log in to unmask] * www.sungardhe.com
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain
>confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized
>disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error,
>please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W.
(NS)
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 7:26 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: IE 8
>
>Rob,
>
>That is correct. You have to update each OS rule. Rinse & repeat after
every "Patch Tuesday" update.
>
>Bruce
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert J. Rutkowski [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 6:09 PM
>Subject: Re: IE 8
>
>Correct me if I'm wrong please.. In order to use this manually created
check, if I don't have any other manual checks incorporated into my hotfix
rules, then I need to make copies of every hotfix rule (XP, XP MCE, XP
Tablet, Vista Basic, Vista Home Premium, etc...) and add this check as an
OR for the IE area to all of my copies, and then enable them for the
Requirement. This is the way I understood it, I could very well be
incorrect though. It seems like a lot of work just to tell it to allow
IE8.
>
>Also, if that's what needs to be done, then why can't Cisco simply update
their hotfix rules for everyone? It's sad that they would tell you how to
manually do a workaround, but not just do it themselves...
>
>Rob
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Roberto Montoya
>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:06 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: IE 8
>
>This is what we got on a case that we opened.
>
>"For now we will have to create a custom check until the next agent
>version download has been released. Here is an outline for the customer
>check that you can put in place:
>
> Check Category - Registry Check
> Check Type - Registry Value
> Registry Key - HLKM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\
> Value Name - Version
> Value Data Type - String
> Operator - starts with
> Value Data - 8.0
>
>For now we are expecting support for IE8 within the next two weeks.
>Right now there is a bug for this issue and is listed below:
>Bug ID: CSCsy62611"
>
>
>HTH,
>
>-Roberto
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Terry Mitchell
>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:52 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: IE 8
>
>Anyone from Cisco/NAC team willing provide an estimate for IE8 support
>(days, weeks or months?). It doesn't have to be carved in stone, but a
>ballpark estimate would be most useful for planning and support
>purposes.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Terry
>========================================================================
|
