Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:49:04 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Edmond--
You might be hearing a missing direct object for "drip":
Wemberly worried that she might drip cabernet on her new dress.
Does that work better to your ear?
Seth
Dr. Seth Katz
Assistant Professor
Department of English
Bradley University
________________________________
From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar on behalf of Edmond Wright
Sent: Fri 3/12/2010 10:44 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: a query
Dear All,
On a different aspect of Natalie's original sentence (' Wemberly worried
that she might drip on her new dress').
Am I alone in finding the use of 'drip' with a person as subject odd? It
would seem more natural to my English ear to say
Wemberly worried that she might allow a drip to fall on her new dress.
>
One could, of course, say
Wemberly worried that she might splash/splatter/stain/blotch her new dress.
Edmond
Dr. Edmond Wright
3 Boathouse Court
Trafalgar Road
Cambridge
CB4 1DU
England
Email: [log in to unmask]
Website: http://people.pwf.cam.ac.uk/elw33/
Phone [00 44] (0)1223 350256
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|