Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk |
Date: | Mon, 17 May 2010 20:07:34 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bill Baxter was the USDOJ assistant AG for antitrust who settled the AT&T case (among others) and broke up the Bell System. He was an antitrust law professor.
________________________________
From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk on behalf of Donna J. Cunningham
Sent: Fri 5/14/2010 1:55 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Duty to Shareholders
Figuring in false negatives and false positives - the quadruple bottom line. I would have loved to hear Baxter's talk! Maybe I should suggest that sort of officer to my student teams who elect officers.
Donna Cunningham
From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Virginia G Maurer
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 11:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Duty to Shareholders
Well, yeah. If incorporating all the ultimate external costs into bottom line wipes out equity, it would behoove management to make better decisions about what to spend reducing costs, including foregoing some short term profits. In the macro sense, it is an agency problem. The managers who decided how much to spend on safety are not affected by this problem in the least. They are retired in the Bahamas and don't work there anymore. Until there is criminal liability for bad business judgment, they won't be touched. And if there were, the agency problem would produce just the opposite problem: Way too much risk aversion. Regulation seems like a better alternative perfection is not possible. More or less like balancing false negatives and false positives.
Bill Baxter used to talk about the corporate Vice President in Charge of Going to Jail.
________________________________
From: Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk on behalf of Donna J. Cunningham
Sent: Fri 5/14/2010 11:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Duty to Shareholders
So glad to see SHAREHOLDERS complaining that the company put profits
ahead of safety.
BP Shareholders Head to Court Over Oil Spill's Damage to Company
National Law Journal
BP investors are the latest plaintiffs to go to court over the Gulf of
Mexico oil spill, alleging the company has long put profits ahead of
safety and now faces potentially billions in losses because of the
ongoing disaster. A shareholder derivative suit was filed in New
Orleans federal court and a similar class action is being filed in
Alabama by 40-plus BP shareholders who contend the company's allegedly
poor safety record, coupled with the oil rig accident, could ultimately
destroy the company.
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202457970362&src=EMC-Email&et=ed
itorial&bu=Law.com&pt=Law.com%20Newswire%20Update&cn=LAWCOM_NewswireUpd <http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202457970362&src=EMC-Email&et=ed>
ate_20100511&kw=BP%20Shareholders%20Head <http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202457970362&src=EMC-Email&et=ed> %20to%20Court%20Over%20Oil%20Sp
ill%27s%20Damage%20to%20Company
Regards,
Donna J. Cunningham, J.D.
Associate Professor of Management
Langdale College of Business
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, GA 31698
Office: (229) 249-2606
Cell: (229) 444-3624
|
|
|