Hi Brett,

You also need to read more carefully.  I wrote that Kuhn was not a scientist when he is writing about what science is.  When he does that, he leaves the realm of science and becomes a philosopher.  When he creates controlled experiments to determine what matter, energy, motion, and force are, then he is a scientist. 

Susan

On Nov 15, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Brett Reynolds wrote:

> On 2010-11-15, at 6:54 PM, Susan wrote:
> 
>> Hi Bob, do you think philosophy is a science in the same way that physics is a science?  You will need a more precise definition of science to follow my argument.  But perhaps that is what you don't want to do.
> 
> But Kuhn was a physicist and Susan said he wasn't a scientist! I know I'm having trouble following her argument.
> 
> Best,
> Brett
> 
> -----------------------
> Brett Reynolds
> English Language Centre
> Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning
> Toronto, Ontario, Canada
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
>     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
> 
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/