Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:58:03 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dick,
That is convincing, though "a lot" translates more to "very much" than
just "much," so that may be tantamount to a "very very." But putting
the adjective between seems to seal it as determiner plus noun. I
still think it acts more like a set construction than a two word
sequence. I don't think we think of "a" plus "lot" when we hear "a
lot." But the suggestion was never one that I expected people to take
seriously.
Craig>
Craig,
>
> Adverbial yes, but a noun phrase used adverbially rather than a true
> adverb.
> Consider the intensifier:
>
> I do it often / very often.
> I do it a lot / *very a lot / a whole lot.
> I do it a bit / *very a bit / a little bit.
>
> Dick
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Craig Hancock <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Bill,
>> I was thinking about situations like "I own a lot, which I check a
>> lot." Or "I check a lot a lot." If we had a different spelling for the
>> adverbial use (which I hear as "alot," not "a lot" in the above
>> instances), I think it would better represent the way the structure
>> has evolved both phonetically and cognitively. I hear it and think of
>> it as a single word spelled as two.
>> Of course, the written language is innately conservative in the
>> classic
>> sense of that term. People will treat it as an error. Even as I type
>> this, the computer puts a red squiggly line underneath "alot" to cajole
>> me back.
>>
>> Craig
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface
> at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|