FACULTYTALK Archives

September 2013

FACULTYTALK@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael O'Hara <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk
Date:
Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:02:00 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
ALSBTALK:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2315382 
"The Increasingly Lengthy Long Run of the Law Reviews: Law Review Business 2012 – Circulation and Production"

Ross E. Davies
George Mason University School of Law; The Green Bag

August 24, 2013

Journal of Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 245-271, 2013
Journal of Legal Metrics, Vol. 2, 2013

Abstract:     
This article is the latest in a series of simple annual studies of the sales of some leading law reviews, undertaken with an eye to getting an admittedly rough and partial sense of the state of publishing in the legal academy.  Over the years, the data itself has turned out to be a little bit interesting in spots.  More interesting (perhaps), and more amusing and worrisome (certainly), have been the continuing small discoveries that some law reviews report relatively low paid circulation numbers to the U.S. Postal Service (which appear only in tiny-type government forms buried in the rarely read front- or back-matter of the reporting law review), but then tout higher sales numbers in promotional sections of their websites.  I t is reminiscent of the way some law schools have number-fudged their presentation of other kinds of data to, for example, U.S. News & World Report.  The law review-school comparison might prompt the reader to wonder light-heartedly how many law school deans were once law review editors.  But answering that question would be too easy, and too far afield from the focus here on publishing in the legal academy.  There is, however, another question whose answer might be more interesting, and more likely to lead to intriguing comparisons.  The question: How have the size and composition of law review editorial staffs changed over time, in absolute terms and in terms of their relationship to the product they put out?  Possible comparisons will probably suggest themselves.  This year’s report covers the usual ground relating to paid circulation and associated editorial behavior.  It also offers a limited and tentative first take on the production question.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: Columbia, Harvard, honor code, Law Review, Michigan, post office, Postal Service, Stanford, Virginia, Wall Street Journal, Yale

JEL Classification: I2, I20, I21, I23, I29, K42
Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper
Date posted: August 25, 2013  
Suggested Citation

Davies, Ross E., The Increasingly Lengthy Long Run of the Law Reviews: Law Review Business 2012 – Circulation and Production (August 24, 2013).  Journal of Law, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 245-271, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2315382 

Michael

Professor  Michael  J.  O'Hara, J.D., Ph.D.    
Mammel Hall 228                                                           
Finance, Banking, and Real Estate Department               
College of Business Administration 
University of Nebraska at Omaha 
6708 Pine Street  
Omaha  NE  68182 
http://cba.unomaha.edu/faculty/mohara/web/ohara.htm 
402_554_2823  voice    fax  402_554_2680 (not private) 
[log in to unmask] 
 
Co-Editor, The Earnings Analyst
www.A-R-E-A.org  
Book Review Editor, Economics & Business Journal  
http://ecedweb.unomaha.edu/neba/journal/home.htm 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2