Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Academy of Legal Studies in Business (ALSB) Talk |
Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 1997 09:42:44 -0400 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Just because local laws do not permit enforcement does not mean that
the local lender will not try to exert leverage as a means of extracting
some compensation. Just look at Sears in the US in their pursuit of
post-bankruptcy debtors. I am reminded of a situation where I was
representing a commercial lender in enforcing the prepayment provision as
part of a sale was completed in bankruptcy. We got an agreement that paid
us $70,000 from a $100,000 provision after we threatened to squelch the
sale. Afterwards, the client told me that he would be a hero in the
office, since they never expect to collect these kinds of fees and this
payment would go straight to the bottom line. When I asked our senior
real estate partner about these provisions, he used the label "in
terroram," meaning that the are not meant to be enforced but used only as
negotiating points.
==========================
Dennis M. Garvis =
[log in to unmask] =
Management Department =
Georgia State University =
==========================
|
|
|