ATEG Archives

November 1999

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Fr Laurence <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 13:49:30 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Why should the study of "literature" preclude the study of "grammar"? In
fact, can you really explain the effectiveness of a literary passage
without studying the precise relationship of the verbal units (words,
phrases, clauses) to each other? And isn't that what we mean by grammar
and syntax? Grammatical and syntactical choices have rhetorical effects.
The division between these two "camps" is false and to the detriment of
both. The Advanced Placement English Program of the College Board nicely
recognizes the influence of language choices on style. Surely it is time
for a marriage of these two approaches to written expession. How can ATEG
promote this?
Rev. Laurence Kriegshauser, OSB
St. Louis Priory School
St. Louis, MO

ATOM RSS1 RSS2