LISTSERV - ARCHIVES Archives - LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

It seems you are missing the point. Stewart is pin pointing the
problems of the buffoonery of the political leaders of the Republic (not
a democracy), not the political parties
on the left, middle, or right. He would be doing this with Al Gore or
John Kerry. That is why the people who voted Republican or Democratic
should listen
to John's buffoonery.

________________________________

From: Archives & Archivists
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Benjamin Johnson
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 1:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Early Friday Funny

An interesting op-ed article in the Boston Globe this past
Friday. Whether its reading current events, knowing history, or just
being invovled in general, a trend is emerging.

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/03
/03/why_jon_stewart_isnt_funny/

Benjamin Johnson
Manuscript Cataloger
Massachusetts Historical Society
1154 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02215
617-646-0569

-----Original Message-----
From: Archives & Archivists
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 3:54 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Early Friday Funny

While there always has been some generational grousing, there is
enough
poll data to suggest that the number of people reading about
current
events has dropped. This obviously has greater implications
than
whether one generation follows another'sl tastes in music,
entertainment, etc. I'm not talking about where people get
their news
(traditional print or broadcast journalism, cable, Internet,
etc.).
I'm talking about whether they follow the news at all. In fact,
just
recently David Mindich published a book, _Tuned Out: Why
Americans
Under 40 Don't Follow the News_.
See
http://shrinkster.com/cpw .

An article about public diplomacy in the National Journal in
2005 noted
the results of a poll in 1994

"Americans also fare poorly compared with Europeans both in
following
the news and in understanding it, according to a 1994 survey by
Pew's
predecessor, the Times Mirror Center for the People and the
Press. No
identical survey has been done since the 1994 study, but in that
study,
Americans were less likely than the Germans or the British to
have read
a newspaper the day before the survey was taken and were less
likely
than the Germans, the Italians, or the British to have listened
to
television news.

And when asked five current-events questions based on items then
in the
news, Americans scored next to last among the eight
nationalities
polled, ahead only of the Spanish. More disturbingly, young
Americans
trailed British, Spanish, Italian, and German members of their
generation in reading a newspaper and were the group least
likely to
understand international news. That inattentive and uninformed
generation of Americans is now 10 years older, and it would
appear,
based on the more recent Pew survey, that they are even less
engaged
with the world today than they were a decade ago."

See also
http://www.education-world.com/a_issues/chat/chat078.shtml
for an discussion of the observation that many young Americans
are
"aliterate" -- that is, they know how to read but choose not to!

The Washington Post's Linton Weeks reported on this phenomenon
on May
14, 2001 in an article, "The No-Book Report: Skim It and Weep:
More
and More Americans Who Can Read Are Choosing Not To. Can We
Afford to
Write Them Off?"

Weeks noted, "A 1999 Gallup Poll found that only 7 percent of
Americans
were voracious readers, reading more than a book a week, while
some 59
percent said they had read fewer than 10 books in the previous
year.
Though book clubs seem popular now, only 6 percent of those who
read
belong to one. The number of people who don't read at all, the
poll
concluded, has been rising for the past 20 years."

Weeks reported that "To Jim Trelease, author of "The Read-Aloud
Handbook," this trend away from the written word is more than
worrisome. It's wicked. It's tearing apart our culture. People
who have
stopped reading, he says, "base their future decisions on what
they
used to know.

"If you don't read much, you really don't know much," he says.
"You're
dangerous."

Weeks specifically addresses the "loss of heritage."

To read the Weeks piece, go to
http://shrinkster.com/cpx

All of this suggests that there must be something going on
beyond the
usual us vs. them that you find with various generations. But,
I'm not
a sociologist, I just know what I know from reading the
Washington
Post, Washington Times, the New York Times, Newsweek, U.S. News
& World
Report, and Time on a routine basis -- that is reading them
every
day/week, to say nothing of various supplemental journals, LOL.

Maarja

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott, Paul (FPM) <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:07:56 -0600
Subject: Re: Early Friday Funny

Colleagues,

Perhaps it is time we reflected upon human foibles-especially
our own.

Whenever colleagues talk about how woefully ignorant the younger
generation is, I recall a conversation I overheard between two
history
professors in 1965 or 1966. They discussed how woefully
unprepared
were the undergraduates "nowadays" and how my generation did not
know
the basic elements of American History, let alone world history.
We
were even surprisingly ignorant of recent events of only 10-20
years
ago. This conversation was only remarkable only because I've
heard it
many times since then, and not only from historians and
archivists. It
all breaks down to the same phenomenon-the younger generation is
pitiful.

Give the kids a break-they haven't lived through half the stuff
the
rest of us have, nor have they had the opportunity to read even
5% as
much as the average old timer. Besides, it seems that no one
has ever
learned all that much about American History in High School.
And what
do we know of their culture? How many of us over 50 watch their
shows,
listen to their music, or play their games? I don't. The
average
teenager today probably knows more about rock-and-roll than I
know
about hip hop.

The bottom line is that the younger generation is going to the
dogs-always has been-always will. But, in the end, they will
bury us.

Paul R. Scott, CA, CRM

(Curmudgeon 3rd Class)

A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored
by the
Society of American Archivists, www.archivists.org. For the
terms of
participation, please refer to
http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp. To
subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]
In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname *or*: UNSUB
ARCHIVES To post a message, send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]

Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface
at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html

Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt
<[log in to unmask]>

To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]
In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname
*or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES
To post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]

Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface
at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html

Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt
<[log in to unmask]>
A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored
by the Society of American Archivists, www.archivists.org. For the terms
of participation, please refer to
http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp.

To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to
[log in to unmask] In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname
lastname *or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES To post a message, send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]

Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface
at http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html

Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt
<[log in to unmask]>

To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname
*or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES
To post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]

Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html

Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>