Lynne:
While to a certain extent this is true, I would put forth a different idea
that if people believe that information is necessary to be saved, they will
find a way to save that information no matter what form it is stored on.
Lately, Discovery Science has been running Carl Sagen's Cosmos series, a
show which I liked when it first came out and still do today. In one of the
episodes, Dr. Sagen is discussing all of the knowledge about the universe
that has been lost from the great thinkers of places like ancient Greece and
Rome, including teachings about the history of the world, different heavenly
bodies (planets and stars), mathematics, science, etc. Guess what.all of
this information was in written form at some point. Guess what else.it's
all lost. For whatever reason, with the fall of the Greek and Roman
empires, the people of the time didn't feel it necessary to save this
material, so even though it was in written form, and probably decipherable
today, it is still lost.
I don't want to start a war about what is better, paper, pictures or
electronic. However, I also don't believe that just because something is
written down on paper, it is somehow safer than in another format. What it
really comes down to is the desire to see that material saved and the people
necessary to ensure that the information isn't lost, no matter what form it
takes.
What you mention below in this series is a common thread in science fiction.
Read "Ridley Walker" and you will read about a society that has lost all
ability to use technology due to a great war that broke out (if memory
serves correct, it was a nuclear war). Ridley, the main character in the
book, comes to the realization part way through the book that the shiny
metal things he is looking at were ancient technology, and he (society)
neither has the power (electrical) or knowledge to turn it on.
I just had a conversation with a storage expert today. There is one bit of
information that he gave me that will make you think about formats. He said
that like it or now, technology is always the solution killer. Newer,
faster, better technology always comes out to replace what we have today.
This is obvious if you think about it from the manufacturer's
standpoint.they want to sell you something new and keep the revenue coming
in. This isn't good news for archivists because (in this persons words) "it
means migrating to a new format every 5-7 years).
While this isn't good news, there is a bright side. If you are digitizing
your material for access, or for preservation in the event the original is
in danger of loss, migrating files is easier once they are digital. The
migration from one storage medium to another can be automated, and the
resulting files can be checked against the originals to ensure all data has
transferred. So, while the initial cost of digitizing could be high,
subsequent migrations will be less.
John Walko
Media Archive Manager
Scene Savers
www.scenesavers.com <http://www.scenesavers.com/>
_____
From: Archives & Archivists [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Wohleber, Lynne
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Archives/Libraries in Fiction
I have been reading the SciFi fantasy trilogy "Voyage of the Jerle Shannara"
by Terry Brooks. I'd like to share with you what I discovered in several
chapters toward the end of the second volume that speak to preservation of
information and the future.
The essence of the plot, to that point, is that "the last of the Druids" and
several persons picked carefully for their special talents, have embarked on
a journey to a land several months distant to recover a treasure of profound
magic that is more than 3000 years old. Toward the end of the second book,
it suddenly became clear to me that the main characters were not from a
civilization of "Middle Earth", but a time 3000 years into the future from
our present time. The area which they came to explore was a vast place of
metal that was in ruins from "the Great War" and was guarded by laser beams
that shot "fire threads" and mechanical, robotic dogs. The treasure that the
Druid was seeking, he thought, were books with all the knowledge of the
world housed in what would have been called a Library. He believed this
knowledge would alleviate the poverty and correct the lack of knowledge in
his civilization. But as he searched the building in which he knew they
were housed, he found no large shelving units nor closets in which such
items could have been preserved. He then looked for an alternate method of
preserving the information and discovered a room in the hub of this vast
electronic village with machinery that held disks. Voices could be heard
as the disks were constantly being reformatted automatically onto new disks
to prevent loss of information. He realized at that moment that there was
no knowledge nor equipment in his world that could translate any of the
material on the disks, and he had to make the decision to abandon taking the
disks back because they would be useless, or destroying the monster that
controlled the systems and therefore destroy the disks as well.
Does this not speak to the dilemma that we constantly discuss on the
ListServ about the longevity of disks and the constant turnover of the
equipment to access the information they contain? Thank about it .. What
will happen in 3000 years when a civilization of unknown proportions seeks
to discover and decipher the contents of the information that we have
preserved? What will be their best chance . Paper or disks?
Lynne F. Wohleber
Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh
900 Oliver Building
535 Smithfield St.
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
412-325-0087 x138
FAX: 412-471-5591
[log in to unmask]
A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored by the
Society of American Archivists, www.archivists.org. For the terms of
participation, please refer to
http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask] In
body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname *or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES To
post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored by the Society of American Archivists, www.archivists.org.
For the terms of participation, please refer to http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname
*or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES
To post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>