It being a late Friday afternoon (and a LOVELY one out there, what with me
stuck in front of this monitor), I find this difficult to resist.
I predict that cuneiform, as a preservation technology, will go away. Along
with palm-leaf books.
(Sigh. This discussion is becoming one of our cyclical themes here on Arch &
Archs-L...guess it was time to revisit it).
Dennis ³I still shoot silver² Moser
~~
Dennis Moser
Digital Content Manager, Systems/CUL Information Support Services
Central University Libraries, Southern Methodist University
PO Box 750135 Dallas, TX 75275-0135
E-mail: [log in to unmask] http://people.smu.edu/dmoser
214.768.1268 (Fax-214.768.3815)
_________________________________________________________
"Variety of opinion is necessary for objective knowledge."
Paul Feyerabend: "Against Method" 1975.
_________________________________________________________
From: "Michael D. Gibson" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: "Michael D. Gibson" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 15:31:30 -0500
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARCHIVES] Microfilm --- Is this technology going away?
Is a digital image EYE READABLE? A microfilmed image is readable with the
naked eye. Granted it might be a pain the the ³you know what² to read it
without a microfilm reader, but with a magnifying glass and a flashlight you
can read it with the naked eye. Is a CD eye readable? Only if the software
and hardware are there to allow you access. If digital data is not
constantly transferred to the latest, up-to-date format and you don¹t have
the proper software interface and/or the proper hardware (equipment,
machine, etc.) what will you do? This is the question archivists must
ask---is it eye readable. Digital vendors tout all of the wondrous
advantages of the new technology and claim they will ³digitize² entire
collections. Yeah, they will ³digitize² it alright‹right out of existence!
The naked eye will never see it and you will never be able to read it.
From: Archives & Archivists [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Bethke, Neil
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 1:54 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Microfilm --- Is this technology going away?
Kim-
It reminds me of a few years ago when a major mag tape manufacturer decided
to shutter their tape factories. The resultant turmoil from ironically the
digital magnetic storage sector spun off the creation of Quantegy (sp?) as a
new supplier of mag tape.
Similar to the segment of ³old-school photography² that is resistant to
digital imaging there are plenty of audio mixers who are still anaolgŠthe
net net result will no doubt simply be higher retail pricing of
polymer-based media as a high-end niche specialty market Š
IMHO
Neil Bethke
LMU Archives
From: Archives & Archivists [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Scott, Kim
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Microfilm --- Is this technology going away?
I have no hard evidence to back up this thought, but I believe that
microfilm supplies, at least on the reading end, will be with us for some
time to come. I do believe that original FILMING will be harder to do; the
whole market for silver based photographic supplies will begin to dry up as
most folks become more comfortable with digital cameras, etc. But when you
consider how cheap (and truth be told ) how simple microfilm readers are, it
ought to be fairly easy to keep them going. After all, its just a matter of
lightbulbs, mirrors, and frosted glassŠ.
Kim Allen Scott
Montana State University, Bozeman
From: Archives & Archivists [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Tom Kemp
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 12:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Microfilm --- Is this technology going away?
There has been a thread on another library list that proposes that microfilm
and its associated technology is going away.
The idea is that the companies that make the film itself, film duplicating
equipment, microfilm cameras, readers, etc. are all dropping microfilm
related products. It goes further to suggest that because of this it is very
difficult to acquire replacement equipment.
It suggests that business, government, archives and libraries are all moving
to digital preservation of business records and historical records/documents
causing a steady down shift in the market.
Like other, older formats the end product still exists (5.4" floppies; 3.5"
floppies; 8 track etc.) but that the equipment we'll need to use and
replicate the microfilm will not be there. That it will be difficult to get
spare parts; replacement equipment.
What are you hearing on this?
Thanks.
A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored by the
Society of American Archivists, www.archivists.org. For the terms of
participation, please refer to
http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask] In
body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname *or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES To
post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
A posting from the Archives Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored by the
Society of American Archivists, www.archivists.org. For the terms of
participation, please refer to
http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask] In
body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname *or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES To
post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]> A
posting from the Archives Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored by the Society
of American Archivists, www.archivists.org. For the terms of participation,
please refer to http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask] In
body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname *or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES To
post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]> A
posting from the Archives Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored by the Society
of American Archivists, www.archivists.org. For the terms of participation,
please refer to http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask] In
body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname *or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES To
post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored by the Society of American Archivists, www.archivists.org.
For the terms of participation, please refer to http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname
*or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES
To post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>