I would err on the side of caution. My
first thought was why not? But two things, first he
might be tempted not to copy if he finds
two copies in the box. Second, you have no control
over what is being copied, what if it is
items you might generally restrict because they have
social security numbers, etc. And
finally, I sometimes get caught in precedent setting
situations…e.g. you let Tom Smith
copy, why can’t I? I generally try to err on the side of the
rule fits all. Despite the workload
question, it might be better to simply ask the researcher
to identify what he wants copies of. You
can always point out that later if he got home and
found his data was wrong, he wouldn’t
know what was being copied. You could temporarily
mark the items to be copied….using
color plastiklips or some such (no post it notes!!).
Dean
Dean DeBolt
University
Librarian, Special Collections
John C. Pace
Library,
850-474-2213
From: Archives &
Archivists [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Schmid, Christine
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:46
AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Levels of access
I am
in need of the wisdom of my colleagues regarding access.
We
have a researcher who has been working for several weeks on a large collection.
It was processed only on a box level and is about 200 record sized boxes. This
researcher will be leaving town soon and wants to be able to photocopy
documents in it on his own. He is willing to bring in his own copier, do it
himself and still pay for the copies. We are actually considering his request
because the collection is not in good order and the copying, if done by our
part time worker, would take quite a while to get done because of the volume
and disarray of the collection. Basically it would be easier on some of the
staff.
We
have some reservations of course. The only open space for him to set up and
work would be where he would be unsupervised. Call me pessimistic and skeptical
but I don't tend to trust anyone with historic records that I have been
employed to care for.
Also,
this researcher has a history of continuously asking for more leeway on the
rules and we always give an inch, give another inch and then another inch all
in the pursuit of open access for our users.
Has
anyone been in this or a similar situation before? Advice? I am afraid of
setting a precedent for such open access to our collections and building.
Thank
you all.
Christine
A. Schmid
Associate
Archivist
The
Jacob Rader Marcus Center of American Jewish Archives
3101
Clifton Avenue
Cincinnati,
OH 45220
513-221-7444
x3319
513-221-7812
(fax)
[log in to unmask]
http://www.americanjewisharchives.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask] In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname *or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES To post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]> A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored by the Society of American Archivists, www.archivists.org. For the terms of participation, please refer to http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask] In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname *or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES To post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>