Maarja:

Reproductions made from high resolution scans are fine for display
copies. You may also want to go ahead with the copy negatives for both
long-term preservation and disaster prevention purposes. 

If you have a good deal of IT support and the services of a digital
object preservation specialist then 600dpi tiffs, with height and length
dimensions of at least 3,000 pixels each, RGB, at least 24 bit
truecolor, and preferably at 8 bits per channel make good digital
surrogates for color photographs. Black and white images, text,
architectural drawing, oversized or incredibly small items require
different standards.

Regards,

Jeff

Jeffrey V. Moy, Archivist
The Newark Museum
49 Washington Street
Newark, NJ  07102
973.596.6622
[log in to unmask]
http://www.newarkmuseum.org/archive/



Date:    Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:14:11 -0400
From:    Maarja Krusten <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Photo expertise * follow up query

My thanks to all who have responded up to now, on and off List, with
good =
advice about the 8x10 photos for which there are no negatives.  I knew
it =
would be a good idea for me to turn to the List!

Some of you advise having a 4x5 copy negative made, then having prints =
made from that; others advise scanning at a high resolution, such as 600
=
dpi, to create a digital image.  I probably should have provided a
little =
more detail.  So, I should add that in this case, the project involves =
getting high quality copies made * in a quick turnaround *  for hanging
=
photographs in an important  room in our headquarters building.  Of =
course, I am not going to turn over the only existing originals for =
hanging.  Hence the need for copies.  At this point, given the deadline
=
involved, speed (completing the project quickly, which means photo =
reproduction and framing) is the driver more so than re-use or other =
archival considerations.

Thanks again to all of you who have taken the time to consider this
issue, =
you've been great!

Maarja

Maarja Krusten
GAO Historian
Office of Quality and=20
     Continuous Improvement (QCI)
[log in to unmask]

Date:    Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:52:47 -0700
From:    Howard Brainen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Question for photo experts (reproduction w/o negative)

Maarja,

Certainly the best way today is through scanning; either a high quality
flatbed or direct digital capture with a scanning back.  The choice of
which
depends on a number of factors, including the condition of the print,
reflection problems, etc.  

In terms of printing, both Epson and HP offer inkjet technology that
rivals
traditional photographic methods, and in many cases is far more
archival. 


Howard Brainen
Digital Imaging Consultant
TWO CAT DIGITAL INC.
14719 Catalina Street
San Leandro, CA  94577  USA
510-940-2670 x201
www.twocatdigital.com/consulting.html
blog: www.digitalenabler.blogspot.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Archives & Archivists [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf
Of Maarja Krusten
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Question for photo experts (reproduction w/o negative)

This is very basic question but not one which I've encountered before,
at
least not recently.  I didn't readily find an answer in the List
archives.  

What is the best means of reproducing good quality copies of an older
8x10
print which was shot with 35mm film but for which no negative was
preserved?
I know the best reproduction would be off of a negative, but if you only
have the print, what method would you ask a photo expert to use to
produce
the best possible copy?  Scanning?  Or some other method?
 Years ago I had to have some copy negatives made, but I was wondering
what
you photo experts would consider the best method of reproduction
nowadays.

Thanks, and off list replies would be fine!

Maarja


A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List sponsored by the Society of American Archivists, www.archivists.org.
For the terms of participation, please refer to http://www.archivists.org/listservs/arch_listserv_terms.asp.

To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]
      In body of message:  SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname
                    *or*:  UNSUB ARCHIVES
To post a message, send e-mail to [log in to unmask]

Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html

Problems?  Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>