ATEG Archives

March 2008

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Options: Hide Table of Contents

Wollin, Edith (1 Message)
Veit, Richard (8 Messages)
Susan van Druten (1 Message)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F (27 Messages)
Spruiell, William C (10 Messages)
Scott (7 Messages)
Roberto Perez (1 Message)
Robert Troyer (1 Message)
rbetting (1 Message)
R. Michael Medley (GLS) (1 Message)
Phil Bralich (1 Message)
Peter Adams (1 Message)
Paul E. Doniger (1 Message)
Patrice D. Williams, Ph.D (1 Message)
Nancy Tuten (7 Messages)
Myers, Marshall (2 Messages)
Michael Kischner (1 Message)
Martha Kolln (3 Messages)
Linda Di Desidero (8 Messages)
Linda Comerford (8 Messages)
Kimberley Hunt (1 Message)
Kathleen M. Ward (2 Messages)
Karl Hagen (5 Messages)
Jane Mairs (1 Message)
helene hoover (1 Message)
Gretchen Le (1 Message)
Geoffrey Layton (4 Messages)
Edmond Wright (3 Messages)
Edgar Schuster (2 Messages)
Don Stewart (1 Message)
DD Farms (7 Messages)
Craig Hancock (7 Messages)
Carole Hurlbut (1 Message)
Carol Morrison (2 Messages)
Bruce Despain (1 Message)
Bruce D. Despain (1 Message)
Brad Johnston (4 Messages)
Ben Varner (1 Message)
Atchley, Clinton (2 Messages)

Subject

From Sorted by Sender, Reverse Alphabetically

Date
New Sender Wollin, Edith
Re: Subjunctive
Wollin, Edith
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:24:49 -0700
New Sender Veit, Richard
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:58:53 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:31:48 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:44:56 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Veit, Richard
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:25:17 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Veit, Richard
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:16:13 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Veit, Richard
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:35:41 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
Veit, Richard
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:25:34 -0400
a punctuation question
Veit, Richard
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:48:02 -0400
New Sender Susan van Druten
Re: Subjunctive
Susan van Druten
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:53:18 -0500
New Sender STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:39:58 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:17:21 -0400
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:48:49 -0400
Re: Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:08:28 -0400
FW: Subjunctive(?): not critical that
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:24:38 -0400
Re: Subjunctive thoughts
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:07:11 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 08:19:12 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:06:07 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:17:55 -0400
Re: Problems with communication
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:56:50 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 20:33:19 -0500
past perfect--a final note
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:07:57 -0500
Re: Once and Future English Tense
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:43:52 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:35:50 -0400
Re: Once and Future English Tense
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:05:27 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:24:12 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:46:55 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:42:30 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:43:42 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:35:02 -0400
Re: Expletives
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:01:02 -0400
Re: due to
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:23:20 -0400
Re: Due as an adjective; of as a verb; was ATEG Digest - 25 Mar 2008 to 26 Mar 2008 (#2008-77)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:57:36 -0400
Re: Does English have a future tense?
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:54:39 -0400
Does English have a future tense?
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:31:13 -0400
Re: Because of vs. due to
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:52:02 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:09:12 -0400
New Sender Spruiell, William C
Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule?
Spruiell, William C
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:59:01 -0400
Re: Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64)
Spruiell, William C
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:49:42 -0400
Re: interpretation of a relative clause
Spruiell, William C
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:52:16 -0400
Re: Expletives
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:11:32 -0400
Re: Expletives
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:01:46 -0400
Re: Does English have a future tense?
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:15:34 -0400
Re: Because of vs. due to
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:58:32 -0400
Re: Because of vs. due to
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:33:30 -0400
Because of vs. due to
Spruiell, William C
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:08:03 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
Spruiell, William C
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:14:27 -0400
New Sender Scott
Subjunctive; education vs. literacy; lonnnggg rant; was RE: ATEG Digest - 12 Mar 2008 to 13 Mar 2008 (#2008-64)
Scott
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:38:11 -0400
Re: Due as an adjective; of as a verb; was ATEG Digest - 25 Mar 2008 to 26 Mar 2008 (#2008-77)
Scott
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:03:02 -0400
Re: ATEG Digest - 29 Feb 2008 to 1 Mar 2008 (#2008-54)
Scott
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 20:51:03 -0500
Re: ATEG Digest - 24 Mar 2008 to 25 Mar 2008 (#2008-76)
Scott
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:25:53 -0400
Re: ATEG Digest - 21 Mar 2008 to 22 Mar 2008 (#2008-73)
Scott
Sun, 23 Mar 2008 07:42:30 -0400
Re: ATEG Digest - 14 Mar 2008 to 15 Mar 2008 (#2008-66)
Scott
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:25:53 -0400
Re: ATEG Digest - 11 Mar 2008 to 12 Mar 2008 (#2008-63)
Scott
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:53:03 -0400
New Sender Roberto Perez
"She about to turn..."
Roberto Perez
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:08:21 -0500
New Sender Robert Troyer
Re: Expletives
Robert Troyer
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:56:05 -0700
New Sender rbetting
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED
rbetting
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:35:21 -0600
New Sender R. Michael Medley (GLS)
interpretation of a relative clause
R. Michael Medley (GLS)
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:37:45 -0400
New Sender Phil Bralich
Re: Grammar Quiz responses - continued
Phil Bralich
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:17:59 -1000
New Sender Peter Adams
Re: past perfect--a final note
Peter Adams
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:15:48 -0500
New Sender Paul E. Doniger
Civility
Paul E. Doniger
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:41:01 -0800
New Sender Patrice D. Williams, Ph.D
Re: a punctuation question
Patrice D. Williams, Ph.D
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:48 -0500
New Sender Nancy Tuten
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Nancy Tuten
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:47:14 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Nancy Tuten
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:20:16 -0500
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:40:28 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:34:13 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:12:41 -0400
gerund vs infinitive
Nancy Tuten
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:44:21 -0400
Re: a punctuation question
Nancy Tuten
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:36:45 -0400
New Sender Myers, Marshall
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED
Myers, Marshall
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:38:22 -0500
Re: BOOK REVIEW NEEDED
Myers, Marshall
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:07:54 -0500
New Sender Michael Kischner
For fellow sentence diagrammers
Michael Kischner
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:56:38 -0700
New Sender Martha Kolln
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Martha Kolln
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:31:32 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Martha Kolln
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:16:33 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Martha Kolln
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 19:35:22 -0500
New Sender Linda Di Desidero
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:38:19 -0400
That/Which Rule post from WPA
Linda Di Desidero
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:42:14 -0400
Re: Subjunctive
Linda Di Desidero
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:36:08 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:54:24 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Di Desidero
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:38:41 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Linda Di Desidero
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:03:24 -0400
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:22:06 -0400
Re: "She about to turn..."
Linda Di Desidero
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:31:33 -0400
New Sender Linda Comerford
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:16:03 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:06:16 -0400
Re: past perfect--a final note
Linda Comerford
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:04:01 -0500
Passive
Linda Comerford
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:51:31 -0400
Re: Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:02:12 -0400
Re: Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:26:25 -0400
Re: Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:15:34 -0400
Expletives
Linda Comerford
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:09:47 -0400
New Sender Kimberley Hunt
Defining passive voice
Kimberley Hunt
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 20:43:10 -0600
New Sender Kathleen M. Ward
Re: Subjunctive
Kathleen M. Ward
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:47:19 -0700
Re: interpretation of a relative clause
Kathleen M. Ward
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:58:03 -0700
New Sender Karl Hagen
Re: Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule?
Karl Hagen
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:42:00 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
Karl Hagen
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:57:25 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
Karl Hagen
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:14:06 -0700
Re: Subjunctive
Karl Hagen
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:22:30 -0700
Re: past perfect--a final note
Karl Hagen
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:42:09 -0800
New Sender Jane Mairs
Jane Mairs - out of the office
Jane Mairs
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:30:42 -0400
New Sender helene hoover
Re: past perfect--a final note
helene hoover
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 21:45:48 +0000
New Sender Gretchen Le
Re: Grammar Quiz responses - continued
Gretchen Le
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 15:33:32 -0800
New Sender Geoffrey Layton
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Geoffrey Layton
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:37:44 -0500
Re: Once and Future English Tense
Geoffrey Layton
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:48:46 -0500
Re: Does English have a future tense?
Geoffrey Layton
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:34:18 -0500
Re: a punctuation question
Geoffrey Layton
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:59:43 -0500
New Sender Edmond Wright
Re: Redundancy
Edmond Wright
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:56:53 +0000
Re: interpretation of a relative clause
Edmond Wright
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:47:16 +0000
Re: due to
Edmond Wright
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:48:31 +0000
New Sender Edgar Schuster
Re: past perfect--a final note
Edgar Schuster
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:38:50 EST
Re: past perfect--a final note
Edgar Schuster
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:05:28 EST
New Sender Don Stewart
Re: "She about to turn..."
Don Stewart
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:28:23 -0400
New Sender DD Farms
Re: Zombie rule, or Frankenstein rule?
DD Farms
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:37:28 -0500
Re: Subjunctive thoughts
DD Farms
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:59:39 -0500
Re: Subjunctive
DD Farms
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:06:25 -0500
Subjunctive
DD Farms
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:30:55 -0500
Once and Future English Tense
DD Farms
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:49:43 -0500
Re: Grammar Quiz responses - continued
DD Farms
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:36:20 -0600
Expletives redundancy
DD Farms
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:02:34 -0500
New Sender Craig Hancock
Re: Right- and left-branching sentences and intonation
Craig Hancock
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 15:12:04 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Craig Hancock
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:42:41 -0500
Re: past perfect--a final note
Craig Hancock
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:06:32 -0500
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Craig Hancock
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:26:28 -0400
Re: Expletives
Craig Hancock
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:07:30 -0400
Re: due to
Craig Hancock
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:55:27 -0400
Re: due to
Craig Hancock
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:24:13 -0400
New Sender Carole Hurlbut
Herb & some examples of The Audacity of Barack Obama
Carole Hurlbut
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 20:56:17 -0600
New Sender Carol Morrison
Re: That/Which Rule post from WPA
Carol Morrison
Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:19:01 -0700
Re: Does English have a future tense?
Carol Morrison
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:05:32 -0700
New Sender Bruce Despain
Re: gerund vs infinitive
Bruce Despain
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:11:33 -0600
New Sender Bruce D. Despain
Problems with communication
Bruce D. Despain
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 05:36:30 -0700
New Sender Brad Johnston
Re: past perfect--a final note
Brad Johnston
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:17:14 -0800
Herb's preference for context
Brad Johnston
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 06:56:54 -0700
Grammar Quiz responses - continued
Brad Johnston
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:16:20 -0800
Felicity has been earning lots
Brad Johnston
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:10:36 -0700
New Sender Ben Varner
Composition Conference in Greeley, Colorado
Ben Varner
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 08:19:52 -0700
New Sender Atchley, Clinton
Re: Because of vs. due to
Atchley, Clinton
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:55:17 -0500
Re: Because of vs. due to
Atchley, Clinton
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:41:09 -0500

ATOM RSS1 RSS2