ATEG Archives

April 2009

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Options: Hide Table of Contents

Wanda Van Goor (1 Message)
Terry Tiernan (1 Message)
Susan van Druten (7 Messages)
Strasheim, Dwayne (1 Message)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F (50 Messages)
Spruiell, William C (22 Messages)
Scott (7 Messages)
Scott Woods (10 Messages)
Scott W. Woods (1 Message)
Robert Yates (1 Message)
Richard Wallis (1 Message)
richard betting (2 Messages)
Peter Adams (2 Messages)
Paul E. Doniger (6 Messages)
Patricia Lafayllve (5 Messages)
O'Sullivan, Brian P (16 Messages)
Natalie Gerber (4 Messages)
Myers, Marshall (4 Messages)
Martha Kolln (2 Messages)
Linda Comerford (8 Messages)
Larry Beason (1 Message)
Katz, Seth (1 Message)
Kathleen M. Ward (1 Message)
Karl Hagen (2 Messages)
John Dews-Alexander (8 Messages)
Jeff Wiemelt (1 Message)
Jean Waldman (1 Message)
Jane Saral (1 Message)
Gerald Walton (1 Message)
Edmond Wright (1 Message)
Edgar Schuster (2 Messages)
Dick Veit (11 Messages)
Dee Allen-Kirkhouse (1 Message)
Debbie Bryant (1 Message)
DD Farms (5 Messages)
David Kehe (1 Message)
Craig Hancock (21 Messages)
Castilleja, Janet (4 Messages)
Bruce Despain (16 Messages)
Brad Johnston (23 Messages)
Beth Young (2 Messages)
Audra M Himes (1 Message)
Anthony DeFazio (1 Message)

Subject

From Sorted by Sender, Reverse Alphabetically

Date
New Sender Wanda Van Goor
Re: New Sentence
Wanda Van Goor
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:46:06 EDT
New Sender Terry Tiernan
Re: text recommendation
Terry Tiernan
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:53:42 -0400
New Sender Susan van Druten
Re: syntax in a legal document
Susan van Druten
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:53:15 -0500
Re: syntax in a legal document
Susan van Druten
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:29:44 -0500
Re: syntax in a legal document
Susan van Druten
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 18:49:27 -0500
Re: syntax in a legal document
Susan van Druten
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 18:02:14 -0500
syntax in a legal document
Susan van Druten
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:42:47 -0500
Re: cutting the pear in half
Susan van Druten
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:59:11 -0500
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Susan van Druten
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:02:05 -0500
New Sender Strasheim, Dwayne
Re: It should or There should be
Strasheim, Dwayne
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:59:53 -0500
New Sender STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Re: Syntax, cheatin, and "times like these"; was ATEG Digest - 5 Apr 2009 to 6 Apr 2009 (#2009-77)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:30:37 -0400
Re: Syntax, cheatin, and "times like these"
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:50:11 -0400
Re: syntax in a legal document
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:48:59 -0400
Re: syntax in a legal document
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 20:04:26 -0400
Re: syntax in a legal document
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 19:36:42 -0400
Re: syntax in a legal document
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 17:11:45 -0400
Re: S&W & What dunnit? was ATEG Digest - 15 Apr 2009 to 16 Apr 2009 (#2009-87)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:49:30 -0400
Re: S&W & What dunnit? was ATEG Digest - 15 Apr 2009 to 16 Apr 2009 (#2009-87)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:14:51 -0400
Re: Rid the undesired
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:41:53 -0400
Re: object of a preposition?
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:16:14 -0400
Re: object of a preposition?
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:31:13 -0400
Re: Making Peace In The Language Wars
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:30:30 -0400
Re: Making Peace In The Language Wars
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:39:30 -0400
Re: Making Peace In The Language Wars
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:40:22 -0400
Re: Lester's text in the classroom (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:42:05 -0400
Re: Lester's text in the classroom (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:43:13 -0400
Re: Lester's text in the classroom (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:21:55 -0400
Re: FWD: Lester's Text in the Classroom
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:21:53 -0400
Re: Lester's Grammar in the Classroom
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:05:46 -0400
Re: Lester's Grammar in the Classroom
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:40:23 -0400
Re: Lester's Grammar in the Classroom
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:42:25 -0400
Re: Herb re Lester's Grammar
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 20:38:01 -0400
Re: Grammar help: "First of all,..."
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:30:27 -0400
Re: Grammar help: "First of all,..."
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:27:51 -0400
Re: Grammar help: "First of all,..."
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:22:00 -0400
Re: Grammar help: "First of all,..."
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:33:24 -0400
Re: General confusion
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:27:22 -0400
Re: Exhibit #104, Jespersen's Modern English Grammar
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:17:43 -0400
Re: Exhibit #104, Jespersen's Modern English Grammar
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:20:21 -0400
Re: Exhibit #104, Jespersen's Modern English Grammar
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:38:36 -0400
Re: Exhibit #104, Jespersen's Modern English Grammar
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:12:07 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:26:00 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:59:38 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:25:45 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:54:52 -0400
Re: Comma splice = F
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:52:06 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 23:00:32 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:58:11 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:28:08 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:24:21 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:04:11 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 20:35:12 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:58:32 -0400
Re: Adpositions in English
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:14:12 -0400
Re: Adpositions in English
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:11:41 -0400
Re: Adpositions in English
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:11:00 -0400
Re: (was: Lester's text in the classroom) (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:10:46 -0400
Re: (was: Lester's text in the classroom) (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:29:41 -0400
Re: (was: Lester's text in the classroom) (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 01:17:43 -0400
Re: " Hone in on" & Pulliiam's credentials; was ATEG Digest - 17 Apr 2009 to 18 Apr 2009 (#2009-90)
STAHLKE, HERBERT F
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:13:23 -0400
New Sender Spruiell, William C
Re: syntax in a legal document
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:44:11 -0400
Strunk and White critique
Spruiell, William C
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:39:07 -0400
Re: S&W & What dunnit? was ATEG Digest - 15 Apr 2009 to 16 Apr 2009 (#2009-87)
Spruiell, William C
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:45:48 -0400
Re: question on a relative clause
Spruiell, William C
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:30:02 -0400
Re: question on a relative clause
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:58:58 -0400
Re: object of a preposition?
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:14:09 -0400
Re: Making Peace In The Language Wars (plus some fun with Webster)
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:45:19 -0400
Re: Lester's text in the classroom (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:16:50 -0400
Re: Lester's text in the classroom (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 16:22:24 -0400
FWD: Lester's Text in the Classroom
Spruiell, William C
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:30:48 -0400
Re: It should or There should be
Spruiell, William C
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:43:50 -0400
Re: Feeding the "Brad" troll: Just don't do it!
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:44:46 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
Spruiell, William C
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:28:41 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:36:50 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
Spruiell, William C
Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:27:44 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
Spruiell, William C
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:30:48 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:09:53 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:18:26 -0400
Re: Adpositions in English
Spruiell, William C
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:23:29 -0400
Re: Acronym ignorance: What's an IDP?
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:15:33 -0400
Re: A discourse friendly grammar
Spruiell, William C
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:30:29 -0400
Re: (was: Lester's text in the classroom) (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
Spruiell, William C
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:41:57 -0400
New Sender Scott
Re: Syntax, cheatin, and "times like these"; was ATEG Digest - 5 Apr 2009 to 6 Apr 2009 (#2009-77)
Scott
Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:43:10 -0400
Re: S&W & What dunnit? was ATEG Digest - 15 Apr 2009 to 16 Apr 2009 (#2009-87)
Scott
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:57:21 -0400
Re: ATEG Digest - 4 Apr 2009 to 5 Apr 2009 (#2009-76)
Scott
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:21:57 -0400
Re: ATEG Digest - 27 Apr 2009 to 28 Apr 2009 (#2009-99)
Scott
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:26:28 -0400
Re: ATEG Digest - 21 Apr 2009 to 23 Apr 2009 (#2009-94)
Scott
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:17:40 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Scott
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:08:23 -0400
Re: " Hone in on" & Pulliiam's credentials; was ATEG Digest - 17 Apr 2009 to 18 Apr 2009 (#2009-90)
Scott
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:23:58 -0400
New Sender Scott Woods
Re: question on a relative clause/ignore my other recent posts
Scott Woods
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:58:42 -0700
Re: question on a relative clause
Scott Woods
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:51:59 -0700
Re: question on a relative clause
Scott Woods
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:51:54 -0700
Re: question on a relative clause
Scott Woods
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:51:53 -0700
Re: question on a relative clause
Scott Woods
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:51:52 -0700
Re: question on a relative clause
Scott Woods
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:41:56 -0700
Grammar help: "First of all,..."
Scott Woods
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:27:39 -0700
Re: cutting the pear in half
Scott Woods
Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:40:06 -0700
Re: cutting the pear in half
Scott Woods
Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:55:07 -0700
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Scott Woods
Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:20:45 -0700
New Sender Scott W. Woods
Re: text recommendation
Scott W. Woods
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 23:11:20 -0700
New Sender Robert Yates
A discourse friendly grammar
Robert Yates
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:29:51 -0500
New Sender Richard Wallis
Feeding the "Brad" troll: Just don't do it!
Richard Wallis
Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:07:16 -0700
New Sender richard betting
Re: cutting the pear in half
richard betting
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:22:54 -0500
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
richard betting
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:39:39 -0500
New Sender Peter Adams
Re: Grammar help: "First of all,..."
Peter Adams
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:32:28 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
Peter Adams
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:29:44 -0400
New Sender Paul E. Doniger
Re: Grammar help: "First of all,..."
Paul E. Doniger
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:20:12 -0700
Re: General "your" (was Adpositions in English)
Paul E. Doniger
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:24:40 -0700
Re: Feeding the "Brad" troll: Just don't do it!
Paul E. Doniger
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:11:47 -0700
Re: Any member can give their opinion
Paul E. Doniger
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 02:48:14 -0700
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Paul E. Doniger
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:44:27 -0700
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Paul E. Doniger
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:32:23 -0700
New Sender Patricia Lafayllve
Re: text recommendation
Patricia Lafayllve
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:40:54 -0400
Re: text recommendation
Patricia Lafayllve
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:56:23 -0400
Re: Grammar help: "First of all,..."
Patricia Lafayllve
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:31:49 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
Patricia Lafayllve
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:18:12 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Patricia Lafayllve
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:02:07 -0400
New Sender O'Sullivan, Brian P
Re: syntax in a legal document
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:47:29 -0400
Re: syntax in a legal document
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:55:26 -0400
Re: Making Peace In The Language Wars
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:29:29 -0400
Re: Making Peace In The Language Wars
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:13:29 -0400
Re: Herb re Lester's Grammar
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:22:29 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:33:24 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:35:57 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:29:33 -0400
Re: Craig: Making Peace In The Language Wars
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:12:03 -0400
Re: Comma splice = F
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 22:38:22 -0400
Re: Comma splice = F
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:06:57 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:27:31 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:45:30 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:24:51 -0400
Any member can give their opinion
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:15:46 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
O'Sullivan, Brian P
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:23:44 -0400
New Sender Natalie Gerber
Re: Sequencing information in sentences
Natalie Gerber
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:18:09 -0400
Re: question on a relative clause
Natalie Gerber
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:29:42 -0400
question on a relative clause
Natalie Gerber
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:06:30 -0400
Grammar in a TV commercial.
Natalie Gerber
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:15:30 -0400
New Sender Myers, Marshall
Re: text recommendation
Myers, Marshall
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:57:27 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
Myers, Marshall
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 20:50:24 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Myers, Marshall
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:57:03 -0400
Re: Adpositions in English
Myers, Marshall
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:50:59 -0400
New Sender Martha Kolln
Re: text recommendation
Martha Kolln
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:55:10 -0400
Re: question on a relative clause
Martha Kolln
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:09:58 -0400
New Sender Linda Comerford
ISBN Questions
Linda Comerford
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:36:12 -0400
Gregg Reference Manual Found!
Linda Comerford
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:12:28 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
Linda Comerford
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:18:13 -0400
Re: Any member can give their opinion
Linda Comerford
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:12:01 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Linda Comerford
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:14:11 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Linda Comerford
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:39:23 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Linda Comerford
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:33:42 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Linda Comerford
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:05:07 -0400
New Sender Larry Beason
legal consulting fees and grammar
Larry Beason
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:42:16 -0500
New Sender Katz, Seth
Re: Grammar help: "First of all,..."
Katz, Seth
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:16:01 -0500
New Sender Kathleen M. Ward
Re: object of a preposition?
Kathleen M. Ward
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:47:29 -0700
New Sender Karl Hagen
Re: syntax in a legal document
Karl Hagen
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:50:51 -0700
Re: Acronym ignorance: What's an IDP?
Karl Hagen
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:21:22 -0700
New Sender John Dews-Alexander
Re: syntax in a legal document
John Dews-Alexander
Sun, 5 Apr 2009 12:54:42 -0500
Re: Rid the undesired
John Dews-Alexander
Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:02:15 -0500
New Texts
John Dews-Alexander
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:55:57 -0500
Re: New Sentence
John Dews-Alexander
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:08:18 -0500
Re: Lester's text in the classroom (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
John Dews-Alexander
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:44:32 -0500
Re: General confusion
John Dews-Alexander
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:16:33 -0500
Re: Exhibit #104, Jespersen's Modern English Grammar
John Dews-Alexander
Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:28:57 -0500
Re: Acronym ignorance: What's an IDP?
John Dews-Alexander
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:35:44 -0500
New Sender Jeff Wiemelt
Re: Feeding the "Brad" troll: Just don't do it!
Jeff Wiemelt
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:31:44 -0500
New Sender Jean Waldman
Re: Strunk and White critique
Jean Waldman
Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:28:58 -0400
New Sender Jane Saral
Re: syntax in a legal document
Jane Saral
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:07:29 -0400
New Sender Gerald Walton
Re: object of a preposition?
Gerald Walton
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:31:49 -0500
New Sender Edmond Wright
Re: Adpositions in English
Edmond Wright
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:19:41 +0100
New Sender Edgar Schuster
How about White himself?
Edgar Schuster
Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:30:40 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Edgar Schuster
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:17:04 -0400
New Sender Dick Veit
Re: syntax in a legal document
Dick Veit
Sun, 5 Apr 2009 16:19:54 -0400
Re: Strunk and White critique
Dick Veit
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:48:47 -0400
Sequencing information in sentences
Dick Veit
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:57:21 -0400
Re: question on a relative clause
Dick Veit
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:11:27 -0400
Re: question on a relative clause
Dick Veit
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:19:37 -0400
Re: New Sentence
Dick Veit
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:40:20 -0400
Re: legal consulting fees and grammar
Dick Veit
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:47:09 -0400
Re: Herb re Lester's Grammar
Dick Veit
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:08:46 -0400
General confusion
Dick Veit
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:09:44 -0400
Re: Exhibit #104, Jespersen's Modern English Grammar
Dick Veit
Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:10:28 -0400
Acronym ignorance: What's an IDP?
Dick Veit
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:08:04 -0400
New Sender Dee Allen-Kirkhouse
Re: New Sentence
Dee Allen-Kirkhouse
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:39:23 -0700
New Sender Debbie Bryant
unsubscribe
Debbie Bryant
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:06:59 -0400
New Sender DD Farms
Rid the undesired
DD Farms
Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:28:37 -0500
Re: Comma splice = F
DD Farms
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:53:13 -0500
Comma splice = F
DD Farms
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:03:03 -0500
Any member can give their opinion
DD Farms
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:11:16 -0500
Any member can give their opinion
DD Farms
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 21:33:14 -0500
New Sender David Kehe
It should or There should be
David Kehe
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:57:12 -0700
New Sender Craig Hancock
Re: Making Peace In The Language Wars
Craig Hancock
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:47:09 -0400
Re: Making Peace In The Language Wars
Craig Hancock
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:18:01 -0400
Re: Lester's Grammar in the Classroom
Craig Hancock
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:39:41 -0400
Re: It should or There should be
Craig Hancock
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:46:25 -0400
Re: It should or There should be
Craig Hancock
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:18:45 -0400
Re: Grammar help: "First of all,..."
Craig Hancock
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:37:55 -0400
Re: Grammar help: "First of all,..."
Craig Hancock
Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:20:20 -0400
Re: Feeding the "Brad" troll: Just don't do it!
Craig Hancock
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:42:50 -0400
Re: Exhibit #104, Jespersen's Modern English Grammar
Craig Hancock
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:43:03 -0400
Re: Exhibit #104, Jespersen's Modern English Grammar
Craig Hancock
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:28:27 -0400
Re: Exhibit #104, Jespersen's Modern English Grammar
Craig Hancock
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:59:32 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
Craig Hancock
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:07:06 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
Craig Hancock
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:18:13 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
Craig Hancock
Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:05:19 -0400
Re: cutting the pear in half
Craig Hancock
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:38:07 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Craig Hancock
Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:00:40 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Craig Hancock
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:29:51 -0400
Re: An expert speaks? was ATEG Digest - 14 Apr 2009 to 15 Apr 2009 (#2009-86)
Craig Hancock
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:05:43 -0400
Re: A discourse friendly grammar
Craig Hancock
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:10:04 -0400
Re: (was: Lester's text in the classroom) (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
Craig Hancock
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:28:15 -0400
Re: (was: Lester's text in the classroom) (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
Craig Hancock
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:43:11 -0400
New Sender Castilleja, Janet
object of a preposition?
Castilleja, Janet
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:46:48 -0700
Re: New Sentence
Castilleja, Janet
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:43:37 -0700
New Sentence
Castilleja, Janet
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:11:08 -0700
(was: Lester's text in the classroom) (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
Castilleja, Janet
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:44:39 -0700
New Sender Bruce Despain
Re: syntax in a legal document
Bruce Despain
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:06:00 -0600
Re: question on a relative clause
Bruce Despain
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:01:09 -0600
Re: It should or There should be
Bruce Despain
Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:48:01 -0600
Re: Grammar in a TV commercial.
Bruce Despain
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:29:08 -0600
Re: General confusion
Bruce Despain
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:19:52 -0600
Re: cutting the pear in half
Bruce Despain
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:41:53 -0600
Re: cutting the pear in half
Bruce Despain
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:06:14 -0600
Re: cutting the pear in half
Bruce Despain
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:14:29 -0600
Re: cutting the pear in half
Bruce Despain
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:02:06 -0600
Re: cutting the pear in half
Bruce Despain
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:16:00 -0600
Re: cutting the pear in half
Bruce Despain
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:55:04 -0600
Re: cutting the pear in half
Bruce Despain
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:21:55 -0600
Re: Adpositions in English
Bruce Despain
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:23:14 -0600
Re: Adpositions in English
Bruce Despain
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:14:30 -0600
Adpositions in English
Bruce Despain
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:31:45 -0600
Re: (was: Lester's text in the classroom) (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
Bruce Despain
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:40:02 -0600
New Sender Brad Johnston
Testing: one, two, three
Brad Johnston
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 08:07:17 -0700
Syntax, cheatin, and "times like these"
Brad Johnston
Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:16:00 -0700
Re: syntax in a legal document
Brad Johnston
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:53:28 -0700
Still testing 1,2,3.
Brad Johnston
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:32:57 -0700
Over the Bounding Main ( 1 )
Brad Johnston
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:24:26 -0700
Making Peace In The Language Wars
Brad Johnston
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:14:00 -0700
Re: Lester's text in the classroom (was: Phrasal Verb Overview)
Brad Johnston
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 07:36:55 -0700
Re: Lester's Grammar in the Classroom
Brad Johnston
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:55:27 -0700
Lester's Grammar in the Classroom
Brad Johnston
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 06:24:36 -0700
If you can do it, do it.
Brad Johnston
Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:58:23 -0700
If you can do it, do it.
Brad Johnston
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:24:13 -0700
Re: Herb re Lester's Grammar
Brad Johnston
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:58:11 -0700
Herb re Lester's Grammar
Brad Johnston
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:16:01 -0700
Feeding the "Brad" troll
Brad Johnston
Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:42:56 -0700
Exhibit #104, Jespersen's Modern English Grammar
Brad Johnston
Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:09:16 -0700
Re: cutting the pear in half
Brad Johnston
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:49:32 -0700
Re: cutting the pear in half
Brad Johnston
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:41:46 -0700
Re: cutting the pear in half
Brad Johnston
Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:14:02 -0700
Re: cutting the pear in half
Brad Johnston
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:01:20 -0700
cutting the pear in half
Brad Johnston
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:13:18 -0700
Craig: Making Peace In The Language Wars
Brad Johnston
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:40:25 -0700
Re: Any member can give their opinion
Brad Johnston
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:05:11 -0700
Re: Any member can give their opinion
Brad Johnston
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:53:51 -0700
New Sender Beth Young
Re: question on a relative clause
Beth Young
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:15:06 -0400
Re: New Sentence
Beth Young
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:29:51 -0400
New Sender Audra M Himes
Re: "Limiters" and an intro
Audra M Himes
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 22:08:05 -0400
New Sender Anthony DeFazio
Re: text recommendation
Anthony DeFazio
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:54:22 EDT

ATOM RSS1 RSS2