Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:22:12 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Using "just in case" would mean that grabbing the rail might ease--but not
prevent--the fall. Using "lest" means that grabbing the rail would prevent
a fall. D is the correct answer, although you are right: "lest" is very
formal and borders on the archaic.
Here are some correct uses of "just in case":
I bought health insurance just in case I should slip and fall.
I decided to grab the iron rail just in case the ground was slippery.
Dick Veit
At 10:45 PM 07/13/2001, you wrote:
>Hello.
>Today I have a question about "in case" and "lest S should".
>
>The following question is found in a university entrance examination.
>(Sophia University)
>
>(Choose the right one from A to D and fill in the blank.)
>I had to grab the iron rail at my side ( ) I should slip and fall.
>A. in fear
>B. so that
>C. just in case
>D. lest
>
>Which is the right answer?
>I guess the intended answer is D (of course, you will say it is too archaic,
>but English teachers in Japan likes the "lest S should" expression so much
>that they often set questions about it.
>
>But I wonder if C is not correct. And I would like to know the reason.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>SIRAISI Tomio
>[log in to unmask]
>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>and select "Join or leave the list"
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|