Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:14:22 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 07:30 PM 9/16/2007, Johanna Rubba wrote another extremely good point:
>It is really kind of useless to talk about "race" and IQ without
>taking into consideration the nurture question -- how are children in
>a given society trained from the time they're born? . . .
DD: As a great Psychometrician said to me, more or less, a child is
born with the basic genetic stuff for IQ. They will not improve it,
but they can lose it. Example, brain trauma. Example, faulty
nutrition. Example, not having good stuff for early cognition.
For more clear definition of race, See "The Living Races Of Man" by
Carleton Coon. I got from it a very rough definition; That category
most randomly selected judges of an individual would assign that
person to. Yes, he allowed for those that go into the, " I don't
know," category
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|