Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 1997 09:30:55 -0700 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, 1 Oct 1997, Pat McMahon wrote:
>
> Johanna Rubba wrote:
>
> > ----------------------As to 'ain't', it was certainly ......
>
> Please comment on putting the comma outside of the quotation mark. I
> thought I was taught that commas and periods always go inside quotation
> marks. Only question marks and exclamation points varied depending on
> whether the quoted material was asking the question or showing the
> emotion.
>
> A Harbrace College Handbook shows the title of an article at the end of
> an introductory phrase and places the comma inside the quotation mark.
> Comments would be appreciated.
>
I'm familiar with the usual prescription, but it doesn't make sense to me.
I follow the usage of linguistics journals, which prescribe putting
punctuation inside of a quotation mark only when the punctuation is part
of the quotation. That seems more logical to me, so I do it that way in my
own writing whenever I am not following someone's style manual.
Note that both are prescriptions; one seems to make more sense to me, so I
follow it. Also, I can get away with it for the journals I am usually
targeting for publication of my work. If I were to send an article to a
journal that required the Harbrace rules to be followed, I would follow
them.
I accept both usages in student papers.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanna Rubba Assistant Professor, Linguistics ~
English Department, California Polytechnic State University ~
San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 ~
Tel. (805)-756-2184 E-mail: [log in to unmask] ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|