Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 21 Feb 1998 17:10:28 -0800 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Our experience in a grammar course here at North Seattle Community College
is that Reed-Kellog diagrams work quite well for about ninety percent of
the students. THat is, the students are able to use them to analyze the
relations among the elements of a sentence. For about ten percent, maybe
fewer, the diagramming can be a source of painful frustration. Our course
also makes heavy use of sentence-combining (for putting sentences together
again, so to speak), and sometimes the non-diagrammers are able to shine
in the sentence-combining part and get a lot out of the class.
Where grammar instruction fails to carry over into better writing, I don't
think the diagramming, if it is used, can be blamed. The main culprit, I
believe, is lack of time for practice in the application of grammar to
style. LIke so many maidens, the handmaiden of thought cannot be rushed.
|
|
|