Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 25 Oct 2000 12:14:47 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think that in the general population these hyphenated words are made
plural and possessive at the end, no matter what sounds right to us.
Edith Wollin
-----Original Message-----
From: Johanna Rubba [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: doozie question
One of my students stumped me in class yesterday. We were discussing
apostrophe use, and she asked how one would punctuate the possessive
plural of 'brother-in-law', assuming 'brother' carries the plural marker.
Brothers'-in-law looks terrible to me, but
brothers-in-law's looks no better.
I think this example is a good argument for shifting the plural to
'brother-in-laws' (I'm kidding, actually, 'brother-in-laws' sounds wrong
to me).
What do you all think?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanna Rubba Assistant Professor, Linguistics
English Department, California Polytechnic State University
One Grand Avenue * San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Tel. (805)-756-2184 * Fax: (805)-756-6374 * Dept. Phone. 756-259
* E-mail: [log in to unmask] * Home page:
http://www.cla.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|