Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:30:36 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The original explanation of 'with' marking INSTRUMENTS in passives
explains "the essay was written with a pencil" and "his heart was
swollen with sorrow", where the agent would be the person or event
causing the sorrow. An event agent might be marked with 'at: "his heart
was swollen with sorrow at his brother's death". Sounds weird to me, but
putting anything after 'with sorrow' sounds weird to me, because I do
get the adjectival reading as the default.
The structure is ambiguous, though; we can use an adverb test that is
about as clumsy but also about as adequate as the 'very' test:
"His heart was gradually swollen with sorrow". To get the verbal
reading, you need to conceive of the swelling as a process, not a final
state. This is a subtle matter of whether or not you include in the
meaning a sort of frame-by-frame view of the process, including the
final state, or put the frame-by-frame into the background or eliminate
it altogether, and conceive only of the final state of the process. This
is how Cognitive Grammar would explain it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanna Rubba Associate Professor, Linguistics
English Department, California Polytechnic State University
One Grand Avenue • San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Tel. (805)-756-2184 • Fax: (805)-756-6374 • Dept. Phone. 756-2596
• E-mail: [log in to unmask] • Home page:
http://www.cla.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|