Call me ignorant (you'd be accurate) but I don't buy the attributive
quality of a noun as opposed to a possessive quality. I don't see the
difference between Presidents day and Father's day. Father's day is a
day for fathers as Presidents day is a day for presidents. I see no
difference. What is a day 'of fathers'? Is nobody allowed (and where?)
that day but fathers? Or is everybody a father that day? I think what
has happened with President's Day is that some people left off the
apostrophe. They should not have. Some other people saw it and assumed
that because it was printed it was right. They should not have. For
fun, I went to google and looked for "President's Day" and got 1.95
million results. When I searched for "Presidents Day" I only got 1.92
million results. So, I guess most people with websites or blog entries
think it should have the apostrophe.
I think the real issue with a kid's website versus a kids' website is
not whether it is possessive or attributive but rather whether it is
plural or singular. Is it a website for one kid or many kids?
Obviously it is for many kids as a restroom is for many men. But...
when the writer calls it is a kid's website, are they trying to
personalize it? Are they trying to say it is for you (the kid) and not
all the rest of them and so it is for just one kid and so it is a kid's
website? Are they making us feel special? Like us fathers on father's
day? Or the president on President's day? What is 'right depends' on
what is intended, but quite often what is used depends on what the
writer was told was right. But really, what is right is what gets the
message across with the least amount of static. And if we all go around
writing Presidents' day, people will look at what we wrote and be
distracted by that apostrophe hanging off the end. But maybe what we
had to say about President's day wasn't all that important anyway.
Scott Lavitt wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> As callers say on radio talk shows, "long time
> [listener], first time [caller]." I've been following
> the interesting topics on this list for a few years,
> since a prof in grad school recommended it.
>
> Will someone please clarify for me which is the proper
> possessive form in the sentence "NickJr.com is a
> kid's/kids' website"?
>
> I'm trying to see the difference between an
> attributive quality, such as Presidents Day (a day
> _for_ presidents) and a possessive quality, such as
> Father's Day (a day _of_ fathers).
>
> My inclination is that TV programming for kids
> (plural) is "kids' programming," just like a rest room
> for men is a "men's room," not a man's room. Another
> example, of course, is "women's room." So one would
> say a website for children, such as Nickjr.com, is a
> children's website, right? Therefore, if a more casual
> term for children is "kids," isn't it a "kids'"
> website?
>
> Even though I've investigated a couple of my favorite
> grammar books on the subject--Googled for examples
> too--my current understanding of the matter is
> evidenced above.
>
> Respondents, thank you very much for your time.
>
> Scott
>
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
> and select "Join or leave the list"
>
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
>
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|