Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 6 Oct 2010 15:26:15 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 2010-10-06, at 2:40 PM, Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar wrote:
> I never quite bought in to the Huddleston and Pullum suggestion
> that we treat these as prepositions in all instances.
I think it was Jespersen's suggestion. Huddleston & Pullum just followed up on it. What concerns do you have with it?
> But there is a
> logic to it that is parallel to seeing a noun phrase as noun phrase even
> when it's adverbial in function. It may make sense, though, to think of
> them as complements (ratheer than modifiers) if only because they don't
> work for all adverbs, or even for all adverbs derived from
> prepositions.*
But 'very' doesn't work for all adjectives. I don't think that's a problem. The point is that you can't simply have: "*I went there ago." But "I went there (two days) before" is fine, as are "I went there (two days) before Reiko" or "I went there (two days) before they did."
> "many years until."* "Many places to." We can say "many
> steps down" or "two stops beyond." Or "a whole month away" (this last
> one pure adverb, I think.)
I'm pretty sure H & P would have it as a preposition, usually followed by a 'from' PP complement.
> There may be more, but it seems to me they
> somewhat constellate around time and space, giving us extent or duration
> or range.
As is typical for prepositions.
Best,
Brett
-----------------------
Brett Reynolds
English Language Centre
Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
[log in to unmask]
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|