Dear All: 

I teach a course for future English teachers on teaching grammar. As one
of the course assignments, I have them pick a topic in grammar or
punctuation relevant to their intended grade levels and do a
comparison/contrast of how the topic is treated in K-12 textbooks for
that grade level, and in reference grammars (I'm trying to get them to
practice "comparison shopping" for textbooks, with the idea that they'll
have input into the process in their school districts at some point).
Reading their essays, of course, gives me an idea of what kinds of
definitions and rules are popping up frequently in the textbooks they
examine (my university has an educational materials library).  

One of the students this time around was looking at treatments of
passive voice, and one of the texts admonished students never to mix
active and passive in the same sentence - apparently, sentences like
"Sven applied to college and was accepted" are verboten, and will cause
the polar ice caps to melt, or lead to the birth of two-headed calves. I
had never heard of that particular application of parallel structure
before. I'm almost certain no editor applies such a rule - for one
thing, it counteracts the kind of thoughtful management of sentence
topic that the passive is good for  --  but I don't know if it's one of
the old, bad rules (zombie), or that textbook author's recent invention
(Frankenstein).  Has anyone run into this one before?

Thanks in advance --- Bill Spruiell

 

 


To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/