In a message dated 11/28/06 2:42:39 PM, [log in to unmask] writes:


> They are pragmatically different.  In “Jack hit the ball to me”, “to me” 
> is new information or focus.  In “Jack hit me the ball”, “the ball” is 
> focus.  They would be used in different contexts.  Of course focus can also be 
> shifted with intonation, but I’m not assuming that here.  Analytically the two 
> mean the same thing, but functionally they are quite different.
> 

Actually, I detect some difference in meaning here.   "Jack hit the ball to 
me" seems to be a statement of where Jack hit the ball.   "Jack hit me the 
ball" seems to me to suggest more intention on Jack's part.   More like I needed 
some practice out there at shortstop so Jack hit me a few grounders.

If I'm right about the subtle difference in meaning, then, of course, that 
would push me toward "to me" as adverbial pp and "hit me the ball" as indirect 
o.



Peter Adams

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/