Bill,

 

I think there's a difference between an parenthetical repetition and
placement of an adverb.  Parentheticals, like this one set off with
dashes, can break up constituents in ways that movable adverbs can't,
and can only occur after the word it repeats.  There is also an argument
that "because of" is a compound preposition because we can put "-an only
because of-" after it.  Something like "We spent three hours at-and only
three hours at-the concert" doesn't work as well.  A movable adverb like
"simply" can occur in a number of positions, with little change in
meaning if any:

 

These problems were ^ due ^ to ^ a lack ^ of water in the surrounding
area.

 

I can get "simply" in any of the positions I marked, although after
"lack" I would require comma intonation.  I go with the complex
preposition analysis also because "due to" is not the semantic sum of
"due" + "to."

 

Herb

 

From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Spruiell, William C
Sent: 2008-03-26 17:08
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Because of vs. due to

 

The students in one of my (college) grammar classes are starting to
analyze text from "naturally-occurring" sources (as opposed to textbook
examples) and bringing in sentences that stump them so we can discuss
them in class (and so I can repeatedly notice that English is weird,
which anyone who teaches grammar needs to be reminded of as often as
possible).  A recent example involved a construction like the following
(something like this may have come up on the list before, but if so, it
was long enough ago that it's not in my saved folder; apologies if it is
indeed repetition):

 

                These problems were due simply to a lack of water in the
surrounding area.

 

I could think of two analyses off the bat:

 

(1)          "due" is an adjective being modified by an infinitive
phrase (this is how I usually deal with "able to..." etc.

 

(2)          "due to" is a compound preposition, analogous to "because
of."

 

I used the fact that "simply" is wedged between "due" and "to" to argue
for version #1, since there's no parallel example that would involve
"because simply of."

 

But... I later realized that examples like the following don't sound
that strange:

 

                We canceled the game because - and only because - of the
weather.

 

Does that example strike y'all (you'ns, you guys, youse) as possible, or
have I done the usual linguist trick of cogitating myself into a corner?
I also have to figure out what to do with "command infinitives" like
"You are to do the homework"...

 

Thanks - Bill Spruiell

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select
"Join or leave the list" 

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ 


To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/