Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jul 2001 10:34:33 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
<000b01c10c1d$f198ea80$ddf1fea9@sooty> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 12:32 AM 07/14/2001, Sophie Johnson wrote:
>... Indeed, `lest' and `just in case' are synonymous expressions. So you
>are right: both C and D correctly fill the gap in the exam sentence. And
>you are also right in that `lest' is archaic. On that basis, C would have
>been the better answer.
I must disagree with Sophie. "Lest" and "just in case" are not synonymous.
"Lest" means "to prevent X from taking place." "Just in case" means "in the
event that X should actually take place." Very different. I agree that both
C and D could be said, but D seems the more likely answer. Here are
equivalent statements (not exact paraphrases by any means):
C. (just in case): When I slip and fall, I want to be holding on to the
hand rail.
D, (lest): Because I want to make sure I don't slip and fall, I will hold
on to the hand rail.
Dick Veit
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|