ATEG Archives

January 2008

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Edward Vavra <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:48:29 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3502 bytes) , text/html (10 kB)
Dee,

     You might want to consider the KISS sequence. The materials are all free, and the sequence is adaptable. The following link takes you to the “strategic position” for grade six. The left and right arrows will move you through the grade levels. http://home.pct.edu/~evavra/kiss/wb/LPlans/G06_Intro.htm



Ed V.



From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dee Bauman

Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 10:17 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: scope and sequence for grammar



Hi to all,

I'm a new participant in this group so hope that it is appropriate  to introduce a new topic.

Our district is looking for a scope and sequence of grammar concepts that we can review/adapt for our teachers.   Our 6-12 English teachers are involved in an AP vertical team structure which is currently focused on "best practice" in teaching grammar.  One of our stumbling blocks has been a lack of a clear set of grade level expectations for grammar concepts.

If your district has a scope and sequence, would you be willing to share it?

Thanks in advance for any help that you can send my way.

Dee Bauman



Dee Bauman, Ph.D.

Instructional Services Supervisor

W220 N6151 Town Line Road

Sussex  WI 53089-3999

Telephone:  262.246.1973  x1180

Facsimile:  262.246.6552

[log in to unmask]







>>> Patricia Lafayllve <[log in to unmask]> 1/14/2008 10:02 PM >>>

Peter asks excellent questions!



As an example of how muddled things can get, I would probably think that “red” in the examples below is an adjective functioning nomially (noun-ial?  How does one specify that again?), and that the final sentence shows the word “red” as an adjective.  I admit my bias: I was “taught” that colors were adjectives, back in the Old Days of my grammar school, and only learned later that “some adjectives can be nouns, too” (how I remember it being explained at the time – again, back in the Old Days).  Hence now I still think of colors as adjectives which can behave as nouns.



I’m fascinated by distinctions like this, which makes my students think I am a Nerd.  I have embraced this, and laugh about it with them, although I prefer “language geek,” really.



-patty



________________________________

From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Adams

Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:32 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: tion & nouns



Martha,



Could help me a little further with the form/function distinction.



I'm wondering about a word like "red," which seems to be an adjective but also seems to satisfy the tests for a noun:



Many of the reds in Carpaccio's paintings have faded over the years. (has a plural form)



The red's intensity drew my eye to the corner of the painting. (takes possessive; takes determiner)



But would that mean that "red" in the following sentence is a noun in form but functioning as an adjectival?



The red bathrobe was draped over the back of the chair.



To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"



Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/



To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"



Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2