ATEG Archives

July 2011

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brad Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:46:07 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1433 bytes) , text/html (3991 bytes)
But you didn't run into a past perfect in the sample below. You ran into a 'had' in front of a past tense verb, which is an unfortunately common occurrence, even among professionals. There are otherwise-well-meaning people who insist on putting 'had's in front of past tense verbs, even irregular past tense verbs, which forces the irregular past participle, making them a tad harder to detect.

But thank you for thinking of me.

.brad.25july11.


________________________________
From: Geoffrey Layton <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: intruding 'had's


 
Brad, 
 
When I read this, I immediately thought of you (as I do whenever I run into the past perfect)


As it happens, a team of animal behaviorists led by Jenny Ryon at Dalhousie 
University hadexplored this very question of canine's penchant for perfume in 1986. Their study 
wasn't with dogs—to the best of my knowledge, no controlled studies on 
scent-rubbing with domesticated dogs have ever been done—but with a very close 
relative instead: the wolf (Canis lupus). 

Any comments?
>
.
.

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2