Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 1998 15:17:03 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Michael,
I'm curious about your use of Reed-Kellogg
diagrams. What sentences do you have students
diagram? Are they previously selected sentences, or
do the students diagram sentences from their own
writing? My sense of the Reed-Kellogg is that it works
fine for relatively simple sentences but that it does not
enable students to analyze the sentences that they
themselves write. Am I wrong about this?
Thanks,
Ed
>>> Michael Kischner
<[log in to unmask]> 02/21/98
08:10pm >>>
Our experience in a grammar course here at North
Seattle Community College
is that Reed-Kellog diagrams work quite well for about
ninety percent of
the students. THat is, the students are able to use
them to analyze the
relations among the elements of a sentence. For
about ten percent, maybe
fewer, the diagramming can be a source of painful
frustration. Our course
also makes heavy use of sentence-combining (for
putting sentences together
again, so to speak), and sometimes the
non-diagrammers are able to shine
in the sentence-combining part and get a lot out of the
class.
Where grammar instruction fails to carry over into
better writing, I don't
think the diagramming, if it is used, can be blamed.
The main culprit, I
believe, is lack of time for practice in the application of
grammar to
style. LIke so many maidens, the handmaiden of
thought cannot be rushed.
|
|
|