Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 2 Feb 2000 10:52:48 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tense marking has to be 'doubled' to get subjunctive meaning:
Hypothetical statements or wishes about the present can be expressed in
either basic-verb form or past-tense verb form (at least after 'would'
clauses). To get irrealis statements about the past, you use past perfect:
1. I would prefer that we wait a little longer.
2. I would prefer that we waited a little longer. (This is not a
statement about the past; it's a statement of a preference about the present.)
3. I would prefer that we had waited a little longer. (This is a
statement about the past; something that the speaker wishes had happened
but it didn't happen.)
The last sentence sounds a bit weird to me with the first clause in the
present, but it still is a meaningful sentence to me.
Anybody share these intuitions?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanna Rubba Assistant Professor, Linguistics
English Department, California Polytechnic State University
One Grand Avenue • San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Tel. (805)-756-2184 • Fax: (805)-756-6374 • Dept. Phone. 756-259
• E-mail: [log in to unmask] • Home page: http://www.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
**
"Understanding is a lot like sex; it's got a practical purpose,
but that's not why people do it normally" - Frank Oppenheimer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|