ATEG Archives

March 2016

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dick Veit <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Mar 2016 23:01:20 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2800 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Or maybe just a place adverbial?

The dog buried the bone deep in the ground.
The eagle climbed high into the sky.
The clouds hung low on the horizon.

> On Mar 27, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Hancock, Craig G <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> What we may have here is a stranded object complement in an agentless passive clause.
> 
> X burned language deep into my memory.
> 
> Language is burned deep into my memory (by X).
> 
> Bruce gives some helpful examples of verbs that routinely take adjective object complements. 
> 
> The kids painted the wall black. (complex transitive, with "black" as object complement.) The wall was painted black by the kids. (passive version.) The wall was painted black. (Agentless passive. Black feels like a stranded adjective.)
> 
> "Deep," though, seems to show up in non-passive clauses. "Still waters run deep." "Her remarks cut deep." (Perhaps I was cut deep by her remarks?)
> 
> The big question might be what burns language deep into our memories. Is that an accurate or helpful metaphor for the process? The mind allows itself to be burned by language? 
> 
> To me, it makes more sense to say that much of language has become routinized. There is an evolutionary advantage to routinization in so many human activities. The language has been learned, becomes routinized, and then resists being brought to conscious attention, especially when the value of conscious attention has been denigrated and people have very little experience with it. 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of John Crow <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 5:19 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: A Question
>  
> The following sentence bothers me:
> 
> As a result, most of what native speakers “know” about their language is burned deep into the circuitry of their brains.
> 
> What I cannot seem to come to grips with is the word "deep."  It is, to me, obviously an adverb, so it should be "deeply."  However, when I make that substitution, my internal grammar checker informs me that that's wrong.  What's going on here?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> John
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
> 
> To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave the list"
> Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2