ATEG Archives

May 1995

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
EDWARD VAVRA <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 May 1995 13:04:27 -0400
Reply-To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Mary,
 
  Why do you need the category "objective
complement"? One of the problems of
pedagogical grammar is that the grammarians
and teachers make it too complicated by
introducing unneeded terms.
    Note, by the way, your use of the passive:
"Isn't this construction called...." The
questions are "called by whom?" and "for
what reason"?
 
>>> Mary Tyler Knowles
<[log in to unmask]> 05/22/95 05:17am >>>
 
Subject:      Re: Sentence Diagramming
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>In "He caused her to do it" you have an
infinitive phrase with its own
>subject (her).  The phrase is the direct object
of "caused."
 
Ian't this construction called the "objective
complement"?
 
Mary Tyler Knowles ([log in to unmask])
The Winsor School. Boston, MA
"I read; therefore, I am."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2