Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:05:35 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
<001501c7f92f$e0d0ade0$46c6c957@Ron> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 08:37 AM 9/17/2007, Ronald Sheen wrote:. . .
>1. Variable IQ results in variable success on the part of students.
>2. This means that as some students are not successful, the
>teacher must finally resort to direct explanation to make sure that
>everyone understands thus partially defeating the purpose of the
>original exercise.
DD: Why? Is the requirement that all pass? Come on now, some students
can not perform to the norm. Read, "The Bell Curve."
>3. There is ample research to demonstrate that students on the
>whole prefer the deductive approach. (refs on request)
DD: But do they learn better that way?
>4. The weaker students end up being passive as they know that
>sooner or later the brighter students (or the teacher) will provide
>the answer. Further, in my experience and based on a study done by
>one of my students, the brighter students resent being put with less
>bright students because they end up doing all the solving in group work . . .
DD: As one who has been there, Yes, I did resent doing the work for
the dummies, unless they were nubile chicks. {My genius elder sister
said much the same, but substitute, "Hunks."}
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|