ATEG Archives

August 2006

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:33:38 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (6 kB)
 

Phil:

From Wikipedia: In linguistics, Syntax, originating from the Greek words &#963;&#965;&#957; (syn, meaning "co-" or "together") and &#964;&#940;&#958;&#953;&#962; (táxis, meaning "sequence, order, arrangement"), is the study of the rules, or "patterned relations" that govern the way the words in a sentence come together. It concerns how different words (which, going back to Dionysios Thrax, are categorized as nouns, adjectives, verbs, etc.) are combined into clauses, which, in turn, are combined into sentences. Syntax attempts to systematize descriptive grammar, and is unconcerned with prescriptive grammar (see Prescription and description).

There are many theories of formal syntax — theories that have in time risen or fallen in influence. Most theories of syntax share at least two commonalities. First, they hierarchically group subunits into constituent units (phrases). Second, they provide some system of rules to explain patterns of acceptability/grammaticality and unacceptability/ungrammaticality. Most formal theories of syntax offer explanations of the systematic relationships between syntactic form and semantic meaning. Syntax is defined, within the study of signs, as the first of its three subfields (the study of the interrelation of the signs). The second subfield is semantics (the study of the relation between the signs and the objects to which they apply), and the third is pragmatics(the relationship between the sign system and the user).

Peace,

David

--- On Wed 08/30, Phil Bralich &lt; [log in to unmask] &gt; wrote:

From: Phil Bralich [mailto: [log in to unmask]]To: [log in to unmask]: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:01:09 -0400Subject: Re: Grammar CertificationThe difficulty I am talking about is that those who take those classes often have trouble recognizing and communicating the parts of speech, parts of sentence, and sentence types as well as relations between sentences and clauses. They may have some interesting views but they lack this basic knowledege. It is missing because it was ignored in elementary school, ignored in secondary school and presupposed in post secondary and graduate school. The certificate, takes the problem of remediation out of the formal programs and leaves it to a separte certificate program. This would be good for community colleges to offer and useful for all professionals to demonstrate they had the basic skills rather. And don't forget most leaving those programs you refer to simply do not have the skills we are talking about. Phil Bralich-----Origina!
 l 
Message-----&gt;From: dabro &gt;Sent: Aug 30, 2006 12:39 PM&gt;To: [log in to unmask]&gt;Subject: Re: Grammar Certification&gt;&gt; Phil:For TESL certification, or an MA TESL, prospective teachers often study syntax, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, and discourse analysis. Is this not grammar in use? I believe it is. Peace,David BrownEFL/ESL teacherLong Beach, CA--- On Wed 08/30, Phil Bralich &lt; [log in to unmask] &gt; wrote:&gt;From: Phil Bralich [mailto: [log in to unmask]]To: [log in to unmask]: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:46:49 -0700Subject: Re: Grammar CertificationThat's nice, but it still leaves room for someone not to know that participial phrase and a reduced adejective clause are the same thing. A certification test for grammar alone independent of getting a Master's would be a real service for those who want and can teach grammar and for those who want to hire qualified grammar teachers. It is also one more line, one more certification on 
a C.V. so it cannot be a bad thing. This would have been the best response to reports that grammar study was somehow unimportant or ineffective. I have always been convinced that most of the anti-grammar movement got its support primarily from those afraid of being called to account for an insufficient background in grammar. To this day whenever I hear someone extolling anti-grammar attitudes I immediately know they will be EXTREMELY defensive abo!u!&gt;&gt;To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:&gt; http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html&gt;and select "Join or leave the list"&gt;&gt;Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.htmland select "Join or leave the list"Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

_______________________________________________
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2