Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:44:09 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It would seem to me, if I may respectfully differ, that _what_ is the
best choice, as in, "President Clinton is to the US what Prime Minister
Blair is to Britain." I admit that it is still awkward, but seems to me
to fit the sentence as given best of all the choices. I agree, however,
that the analogy seems faulty. My feeling is that _which_ would not
work unless preceded by _that_, as in, "President Clinton is to the US
that which Prime Minister Blair is to Britain." In either case, it
changes the sentence from a simple analogy to a S-V-PN structure, where
the "what" clause is the predicate nominative of "President Clinton."
--
Aaron D. Profitt
The Gentle Misanthrope
"It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians
are hanged." - G.K. Chesterton
~veritas omnia vincit~
University of Kansas
|
|
|