ATEG Archives

August 2006

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Adams <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:24:04 EDT
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1187 bytes) , text/html (1485 bytes)
Elizabeth's question about -ly endings on adverbs of manner raises an even 
broader question: how are we as teachers to decide when some "rule" of grammar 
is no longer in effect.   Most of us don't want to be in the role of defending 
archaic rules that no longer describe the living, evolving language, but we 
also do want to make sure our students learn the conventions that will 
stigmatize their writing when violated. 

Two examples I've wondered about lately:   "try and" has appeared twice in 
recent weeks in the New York Times.   Should I abandone my efforts to convince 
my students that "try to" is preferable?   And the apostrophe seems to be 
disappearing in some constructions: Veterans Administration, for example.   

Many on this list have poked fun at those who cling to archaic rules about 
splitting infinitives and ending sentences with prepositions, are "try and" and 
the optional apostrophe approaching the same status?   How will we know when 
they arrive there?



Peter Adams

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2