ATEG Archives

March 2005

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Spruiell, William C" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:46:32 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2241 bytes) , text/html (8 kB)
[Fair warning to list readers: this one is theory-ish, and has no
pedagogical utility]
 
Herb,
 
My experience with serial verb constructions comes primarily from doing
some work on Khmer years ago, and since Khmer is isolating -- there are
some fossilized affixes, but nothing productive - establishing
dependency relations and finiteness in pairs of verbs can be difficult
(I tried using differential modification, but was never sure what the
results really meant). I'm thus using a far looser definition of 'serial
verb' than I should be ("a construction involving seriated verbs used as
if they're a single unit"). That said, I can't help but wonder whether a
(hypothetical) serial verb construction that develops from a previous
finite+dependent nonfinite pair might retain the morphological markings
of dependence on the second element without it actually being dependent
in terms of cognitive processing (and yes, that begs a giant question of
what "dependence" means in cognitive processing).
 
Now, immediately I want to object to my own point, based on its
empirical problems - I've just come up with a reason to rationalize away
any inconvenient counterevidence. It may be possible to get some support
for the idea from psycholinguistic research, though. At a very, very
informal level, I've noticed that when I ask beginning linguistics
students to "split" sentences into constituents, they readily split some
verb combinations but not others, and I can't help but wonder if their
behavior represents psychological reality (whatever that is) better than
some of our models do. 
 
Bill Spruiell
 
Dept. of English
Central Michigan University
 
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web
interface at: http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select
"Join or leave the list" 
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/ To join or leave this LISTSERV
list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html and select "Join or leave
the list" 
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2