ATEG Archives

March 1995

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Association of Teachers of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Morenberg Max <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Mar 1995 15:36:51 -0500
Reply-To:
Association of Teachers of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Ed, I talk a lot about finite verbs in  DOING GRAMMAR.  Essentially, I use
the idea of finiteness to differentiate verb phrases that can be predicates
from other types of verb phrases.  A clause has to have a noun phrase that
functions as a subject and a FINITE verb phrase, that is, a verb phrase in
which the first word in the main verb constituent shows either past or
present tense form (and agreement).
 
I find finiteness a useful concept.  Not only does it allow you to define
clauses, it also allows you to explain participial phrases, infinitive
phrases, and gerund phrases as nonfinite verb phrases.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2