Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 14:43:01 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with Aaron Profitt. The only two possible answers are 'as' (more
formal) and 'what' (less formal). I can see the logic of 'like', but it
sets of the native-speaker-intuition alarm bells.
As to 'the' or no 'the' in generic expressions, it seems to hew pretty
closely to the count/mass distinction: count Ns take 'the' as generics
and mass nouns don't. Is this right? (count nouns can also be plural as generics:
The mosquito is often a vector of disease.
Mosquitoes are often vectors of disease.
Mass nouns, of course, can't do this, because they can't pluralize.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanna Rubba Assistant Professor, Linguistics
English Department, California Polytechnic State University
One Grand Avenue • San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Tel. (805)-756-2184 • Fax: (805)-756-6374 • Dept. Phone. 756-259
• E-mail: [log in to unmask] • Home page: http://www.calpoly.edu/~jrubba
Summer 1999: Response to voice- or e-mail within one week
**
"Understanding is a lot like sex; it's got a practical purpose,
but that's not why people do it normally" - Frank Oppenheimer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|