ATEG Archives

August 2012

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dick Veit <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:18:08 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2422 bytes) , text/html (3197 bytes)
Geoff,

For clarification, when you say the "incorrect" sentence works better, are
you saying that the preposition is better at the end, or that "who" is
better than "whom" in the sentence, or both?

Dick

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Geoffrey Layton <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

>  There's another issue in this post that hasn't been addressed, and that's
> the use of "whom" - "from *whom* he was never apart." My sense of the
> language today is that "whom" is quickly disappearing from use, and that
> most native speakers today would say (at least in conversation), "*who*he was almost ever apart from." Now to the Fussy Grammarian, this
> construction has problems on two counts - first, of course, is the use of
> *who* instead of the "correct" *whom*; and second is the use of the
> preposition *from* at the end of the sentence. In spite of those
> "errors," I would maintain that this "incorrect" sentence is
> actually better than the original, as it refers to "advisors" more quickly
> and clearly than the "correct" version ("by his advisors who . . ." instead
> of "by his advisors from whom . . . "), and therefore should also be used
> in standard written English.
>
> Geoff Layton
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:02:45 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: subject of a clause vs object of a preposition
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
>  Help me with this again, please. I’ve raised this kind of issue before,
> but I can’t remember your answers. Sorry. I would appreciate your thoughts
> again. Thank you.
>
>
> From a statement regarding King Henry VIII from the Wikipedia article
> “English Reformation”:
> “. . .he allowed himself to be influenced by his advisors from whom he was
> never apart, by night or day; he was thus susceptible to whoever had his
> ear.”
>
> Am I to understand “whoever” is correct because the verb “had” needs a
> subject, put better, the clause needs a subject, and that that requirement
> is more important than the preposition “to” requiring an object?
>
> This is the way I guide myself, but I don’t think I should explain it this
> way to my ESL students.
>
>  Martha G.
>
> PS  Hope the conference was enjoyable and successful.
>
>

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2