ATEG Archives

June 2011

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dick Veit <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:45:20 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1012 bytes) , text/html (1237 bytes)
Two quotations from recently encountered novels:

"There's bad blood now. *Didn't use to* be like that..." (dialog in Alan
Furst's *Spies of the Balkans*, p. 102, Kindle edition).
"She *didn't used to* smoke around the kids..." (Kate Atkinson, *When Will
There Be Good News?*, p. 126, Kindle edition).

So which is it, *didn't use to* or *didn't used to*?

A few usage guides I consulted prescribe "didn't use to," but others say
both are standard. In my own writing, I probably would have used "didn't
used to."

On the one hand, "used to/didn't use to" would parallel other verbs
(laughed/didn't laugh), but, on the other, we're talking about a quasimodal,
and with modals we can expect significant variations from other verbs.
Pronunciation is no help--both "use to" and "used to" are spoken identically
as "useta."

Thoughts?

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2