Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:44:46 -0600 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
How about "recursive" instead of "recursible" to avoid creating a new
term? Trying to follow threads on this
site already demands a terminology dictionary.
tj
>
>
> (2) There are clausal constructions that you might describe as
> allowing recursion, but which aren't examples of projection, thus the
> set of recursible (sp?) clauses is not identical to the set of
> projected clauses:
>
To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"
Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
|
|
|