ATEG Archives

June 2006

ATEG@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Max Morenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:16:26 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2413 bytes) , text/html (4023 bytes)
Peter,

I haven't read into the history of punctuation in a long time. But I 
think the "his" story has little or no reality. Here is the 
wikipedia.com explanation:

Despite the above, the English possessive did originate in a genitive 
case. In Old English, a common singular genitive ending was -es. The 
apostrophe in the modern possessive marker is in fact an indicator of 
the e that is "missing" from the Old English morphology. . . .

The 18th century explanation that the apostrophe might replace a 
genitive pronoun, as in "the king's horse" being a shortened form of 
"the king, his horse", is erroneous (a construction which actually 
occurs in German dialects and has replaced the genitive there, 
together with the "of" construction that also exists in English).

Ain't wikipedia great?

Max

>I seem to remember reading somewhere that the "'s" was actually a contraction
>for "his."   I think when a person who doesn't write makes a mark on a
>document, we write undert it "John Doe his mark."   This is the 
>"his" that is now
>contracted into "'s."   Any truth to this?
>
>
>
>Peter Adams
>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
>      http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>and select "Join or leave the list"
>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>
>--part1_467.2d7a96c.31b5fbe7_boundary
>Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><HTML><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Gen=
>eva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" SIZE=3D"2">I seem to remember reading somewhere th=
>at the "'s" was actually a contraction for "his."&nbsp;  I think when a pers=
>on who doesn't write makes a mark on a document, we write undert it "John Do=
>e his mark."&nbsp;  This is the "his" that is now contracted into "'s."&nbsp=
>;  Any truth to this?<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
>Peter Adams<BR>
></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" SIZE=3D"=
>2"></FONT></HTML>
>To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
>      http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
>and select "Join or leave the list"
><p>
>Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/
>--part1_467.2d7a96c.31b5fbe7_boundary--

To join or leave this LISTSERV list, please visit the list's web interface at:
     http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/ateg.html
and select "Join or leave the list"

Visit ATEG's web site at http://ateg.org/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2